Another Objection to Psychology and One Notion of Idiocy

Under social psychology:
Note on "Equals" and "Pecking Order"
I advise people to only accept to be "equal" among friends and the "pecking order" in the hierarchical sense, by organisations, from the state leader to common bureaucrats, from the CEO to the programmer/IT administrators. Even then, the pecking order really only denotes how disciplinary reactions are to flow downward from the Company Board down to the common worker! Please, take note of this and life shines so much brighter!
Pecking order doesn't go along with insanity. And here's why:
You can't be expected to obey a pecking order when there's insanity involved because that's just insane, i.e., there's no use in engaging with insane requirements.
The insane is, of course, placed outside rationality as before, and this in every way!
This is an objection further to these psychologists (some of whom "are hungry for something or not"!).

Here we go again:
Democratic principles...
Objective ethics...
Human being to human being
and then, insofar as peaceful circumstances are possible to obtain, activity is ON, possible to share under these /exact/ requirements, given by this list I write to you now.

Whether you call the people you share the activity with "peers" or not, I don't care!!!

Clearly...

(And USA needs to stop insisting on insane "might is right", i.e., by their Military Complex and other!!!)

Over IQ Testing, The Bell Curve and the Future

I have updated the message to you so that it now looks like this: For political reasons and having entered the US registry first(?), I bring some point of view if you want it:
It should now be noted that the question of intelligence has remained largely/wholly undecided over whether IQ could be connected with humanistic values or not! Now that I've written about insanity and other and achieved reputation more, also for other efforts, I, for one, call for decision IN FAVOUR PRO-humanistic values in connection with the IQ scale that better reflect the actual performance of intelligence with the intellectuals of the World, scientists, engineers, and writers alike, all included!

My latest before the above, "having been involved since the 80s": In responding to these new "contextual-intelligence" idiots, I just want to say right away that I support the testing standards of intelligence (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Raven's Progressive Matrices, predominantly, also by the usual Mensa notions or conventions) and not these "contextual-intelligence" idiots. That to refer to contextual intelligence is to me a way to disguise a kind of stupidity, and the "contextual-intelligence" stories are all too easy to mock, as much as the story goes with "Magic-Moment-at-Drinking-Beer-at-the-Local-Pub" in saving the World from nuclear holocaust and acquiring this utmost /highest/ "contextual-intelligence" because at this special moment, and having trained for beer-drinking a very long time, and seeing this moment coming too, Beer-Drinking Jack from the local factory scores the "ultimate point" again!!!
Be this the "John G." spot of Jochum's Pub in Fars(-e)und "kommune" or not!!! I also happen to support the notion that intelligence testing is to happen neutrally, in the absolute sense, and that intelligence is NOT a social phenomenon, but a measure to rate the functioning of a (healthy) brain in order to predict who is the most successful, and that, even by the psychologists, that the scale is meant to, as Adjustment-updated, reflect the direct performance in science and ALL f*cking else!

(Not because you ask for permission for taking a test, under the torture -clinic, being socially "allowed" to score this or that! Also, by tech-eyes, that are invalidating, not because of the victim, but because of this implant-administering retard who has rejected ethics and Helsinki-declaration altogether and "plays" this very important GAM(I)E!!!)

Also, I find this insistence on the Bell's Curve insulting because it has roots in a (racist-)USA (to Palestinians or poor Africans, because USA is so intelligent is actually scores so high that it moves the "quota" from Africa to its(god-d*mn)self! I also hold it to the Bell Curve people themselves in that they are academically demanded to say "peaceful circumstances for testing or be thrown out of the good society!!! "Also scoring 151/200 _not_ under the torture clinic!"

So a new approach to testing on a more *precise* and *real* basis /can/ be this: 1. The test as before. 2. An additional test array involving a kind of strongly limited personality testing, determining a kind of self-confidence 3. The testing management (as people, three perhaps) then gives an additional "aesthetic" value for "police code as requirement of corrupt personality"/"monkey-business" Final: These 3 steps may be/should be necessary in order to spark a new debate over future progress of human kind and that subversion against this kind of (voluntary) research falls (strictly) outside academic standards. Personality is investigated in line with Jungian traditions. I think there's also good reason to say that US intelligence by fx. CIA and McCarthyism may have been more interested in the personality issues than hitherto known! A slight point on the pre-WW2 suspicions as history writing.

[For the "worried": THIS IS ABOUT THE VERY RESEARCH. NOT THE CINEMA NEAR YOU.]

The "...additional "aesthetic" value..." may be considered set as a kind of "clairvoyance/"seeing the band-track" or other (see Bem of the Cornell University).

Over "The Horn Antenna Ver. 2.0" for WMAP-Map and The Speed of the Magnetic Field

The Idea of "The Horn-Antenna Ver. 2.0":
It's my suggestion that a new "horn-antenna" is set up as a digital pick-up without the "horn"-antenna shape, and that this gets programmed to open and close parts of the pick-up of WMAP signals so that a consistent pattern can be presented digitally. That is, it's my suspicion that the horn-shape distorts the WMAP of the Universe somewhat and that I think this needs to be investigated the way I describe here, as new set-up. It should be noted that the shape of the "horn-antenna" also precedes the essential part of the computer age.
I therefore write this to you now so that new designs can be worked out and a new "Horn Antenna Ver. 2.0" can be set up. I also happen to know about the new WMAP satelite that investigates possible differences between Earth data and (outer-)space data. Still, though, I think this new design should be necessary, even if it may cost a bit of money.
Design therefore, reiterated: a new pick-up antenna, in the electro-magnetic spectrum of the old horn-antenna, but set up digitally, without the horn-shape so that data gets collected in a different way and that one works the collected signals intensely and accurately so that a spherical (any approximation accepted) or other shapes accepted as well, just that the data enters the presentation correctly.

Comment on "the Speed of Magnetic Field":
The theoretical impossibility for Graviton by my writing makes "the speed of the gravity field as matter of magnetism" instant, necessarily.
But the thing is, there may be two kinds of magnetic fields. One that's induced by electromagnetic forces and one that's the property of matter itself. This former may have the speed of light and the other is, as above, instant.
However, the electro-magnetically induced field by electro-magnetic generator may also have the nature of "ball-on-ball-principle" and thus be instant too. This is yet to be determined, to my knowledge, at least!
(I just mention the book of Stathis Psillos that's named "Causation and Explanation" (2002), not that I bother to cite the very page or anything right now, only to say that "I know about it".)

(Remark over the tech-eyes as criminal relation and violation of my privacy: this work has been completed 15:06 CET on 2013-01-31 before being published first on Facebook several hours later.)

Some Fish-Study Prediction Has Been Made - Here's what... (By IOP presentation...)

Victory is declared over the fish-"psychologists" for making a simplified voters' model.

(By suspicion,) I also, by this, have beaten (parts of) Top Gear, swathes of Germany (because the team has had at least one German with them) and David Letterman.

Bow!!! Hey!!! Beer for us on the other side!

(As before, also the holder of mSomatism. This is also, the election-outcome, in line with much of the serious literature on voters' behaviour from the establishment of the political sciences!)

The Psychologists' Insistence on Social Scheming and Murder (of Old)!

One voice says, telepathic or not, to its followers, that former pres. "de Gaulle" [a name relevant to France in this matter] is to die inside the next 10 years. The psychologists follow up with the usual "gaming" of carnivore nature, vowing and displaying "much feelings", drama! Then the former pres. of France actually dies within the next 10 years, but nobody can say whether it has occured naturally or whether it has been a murder, the circumstances are indeed obscured. Not only this, but some time after, another "head in the clouds" take on the blame for what he says is murder and that he now holds this great man's murder in his soul, that he is THIS BIG! Now what does this mean, that if I say it's my nature to kill people and to present myself as an insult to the public at the same time, what is the significance of this? And as this must be said to be self-confirming prophesis, then what? Aren't they insults all in all if they are to say this in FULL seriousness, in full academic honesty? What if one is managing to present another case "on the other side", that people are by and large law-abiding, what is the meaning of this to the above? And finally, why do we then have something that we call "the legal system" and consider this to be a brand-mark of civilisation, the meter we measure civilisation by? So I just keep questioning these "carnivore-notions of old fashioned psychology"! Let's see where this goes! Cheers! PS: Unnecessary to say perhaps that this places it with the demanded, of mine at least, Quality Revision of Psychology incl. the Erich Fromm dispositions and fascinations with diseases and the Scientism-Scientists debate against Resp.towardMysteries-Scientists, ethics in hand, soundly! PS2: You may add some hidden assumptions by the police, the tacit "hate-management" assumptions of the old tradition, the "material" presented and the mSomatism of mine, relating to the cognition of right from wrong in describing Schizophrenia, a not-yet-dead-concept, to say it mildly!

In Organising the (Public) Health Sector - Advise to the Health Minister of Norway

My only advise to Gahr Støre/Store these days in organising an effective (public) health sector for his nation, is a simple one: get the system engineers and quality engineers moving (while also caring for a patient-friendly "interface"/welcoming approach! The rest is taken care of by consensus medicine and I don't know much of medicine that's now, you know, pretty well taken care of ("outside the classics like all cancers", but only in this quote-marked sense, the palliative side should now be most excellent).

History Writing - One Story: U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms

U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms

Started with the blogs of Angelfire.com and One.com: Various!Posted by Terje Lea 2011-02-11 20:00:15

I think the words need to be written and that despite the rather welcoming words of the political kind to the developing countries, I think it's clear that USA remains, at least partly, patriotic radicalist in financial terms and need to be met with both cynicism/hostility and

the consequent raw muscle, i.e., having the dentist to remove the fangs!

Just so that I'm clear, my irritation goes back to pre-Nazi-Germany and the WW2.

Putting V12 Ford engines into the Blitz-tanks of the Nazis.

Greatly surprised by the French copper/bronze statue of Liberty when they, USA, infact impelled the WW2.

While in the ruins hearing the fragile devastated Nazi-voice: "But we studied New York and Broadway" or "But we studied New York and the letters", a code for being in bed with one another over ideas!!

It's also remarkable that when they say they "love" the world and industry is supposed to happen it happens in USA of the kind of Facebook, Google, Apple (with the i-products) and the rest, yet when the rest of the world is to make industry it needs to comply with the "rules"/"rules of the old money". I take this to be a corroborative of the world pre-1939, that is, the U.S. Americans are not necessarily honest!

Looking at the other parts of America, the continent (5+2), usually named Americas by The Economist, one can easily point to a burning Mexico right underneath the USA border and further point to a United Bananas for the rest, i.e., dictators and shady scheming, just for having the slavery and cheap products! Obviously, I demand new times from the U.S. American business network (singular term), thank you! (Not that I expect any guarantee, with a smile of pain from a soon-to-be-an-abductee. )

Countering/running parallel with the question of involvement of Ford and its factories in Germany, the most important question in my opinion is how much goods has been imported into Germany, esp. from USA, let's say for the period of 1933 to 1941?

To what extent can one say that any imports from USA have contributed to the Nazi-German war machine?

And lastly, what about the sponsoring, the acquisition of funds, money or resources whatever to Nazi-Germany? Did they acquire money from abroad? To what extent?

New (I want to test some "signals" here): Can it also be that USA and Japan had an agreement over Pearl Harbour on the number of vessels that were allowed to dock with the harbour there and that if this (bilateral) clause was to be breached Japan would attack harshly? Thus, did USA also impel/provoke this attack and launch into war with Japan?

Did also USA nuke Tokyo into total destruction for avoiding the aftermath of the WW2 against the Japanese (that is, destroying the convention of settling the post-war matters with the Japanese in a "justified" way)? That is, if you have the "war"-documents stored in the Capital (by convention) and the enemy destroys the Capital so that the documents then it becomes impossible to settle a judgment of the war. This may be a motive by the USA to hide the initial crime of themselves to provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour by harbouring too many ships/sea vessels there of the military kind.

It must, though, be pointed out that the Japanese have been hard on their own neighbours for some time up to the point to the conflict with USA in WW2 and it can very well be that the Japanese have gotten what they deserved in the end after all. It has been an aggressive power through the whole of the 30s and has engaged in a number of conflicts up to 1945 and its unconditional surrender. I think this note undermines any fact that USA in any way willingly wanted a war with Japan, but rather, as it is uncontroversionally written, that USA has been assaulted in 1941 in Pearl Harbour. Just to clear some air.

My assertion for the Ford V12 engines stems from a documentary I've seen.

"Burning Mexico" simply means the civil unrest there in relation to rife crime, possibly put to a higher level by insisted U.S. American exports of relatively advanced gunnery, i.e., large caliber weapons and what have you. The military walks the streets there which is a state of emergency, honestly speaking.

United Bananas you can check out yourselves. CBS 60 Minutes had it covered a while ago to some extent.

Further: SS KURSK

First it appeared that SS Kursk had sunk as a matter of malfunction by one of its torpedos (fuel failure, complex stuff) and this was allegedly confirmed by footage made by Norwegian underwater services (closest and ready with equipment).

Rather later, it appears that SS Kursk may have been sunk by an MK48 torpedo of the kind that USS Miami may have been equipped with as its location was rumoured to be close to the "accident" of SS Kursk. This was indeed the finding of the very excellent French journalism and that the entry hole in the front of SS Kursk is identical to a typical hole made by an MK48 torpedo!

The suggestion by this very topic makes it indeed likely that SS Kursk was sunk rather than suffered from a mishap simply because this topic envisions such behaviour from the U.S. Americans likely! Now, don't blame this "psychiatrist"/"psychologist" because that's obviously more joke than true, but still... Hmm... I'm still wearing my Sherlock Holmes outfit and it seems that the world makes this necessary in many aspects! Booo! Beware! SS = Submersible Ship.

Further on USA foreign policy. Relating to the State Department, USA is less than neutral in matter of aid and development to the developing world! Indeed, the UN has for a number of years recommended that this amount of money-value should be about 1 - 3% of GDP. The U.S. Americans can smile all they want, but I want it clear who they are and what their numbers are!

Thus, aid contribution from USA to the developing world speaks for itself: it stands at 0.001 % of GDP or so and has been this way for many, many years!!! So who are they to claim world leadership??? Because they are NOT world leaders!!!

Correction: It appears they do comply with new standards of contribution to the UN and also paying the highest amount of money. The source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations#Funding! However, in the past, USA has been critisised for this for exactly this rule of 1 - 3 % GDP.

Considerations for 2001 - 2002(?).

I can note that it's evident that USA has little or no qualms over deceiving the whole world and the most prominent case for this is, of course, the case for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq (that didn't exist), presented to the UN Security Council and leading to the invasion of Iraq, with its many hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties!

I can also be noted that the direct negotiations between Iraq, by Saddam Hussein, and USA, right before the war, are kept secret (in the hidden, emphasis), for no apparent reason!

I'm going to add a point to the OP on East Timor and Noam Chomsky, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky%27s_political_views#East_Timor_activism:

"Chomsky argued that decisive military, financial and diplomatic support was provided to Suharto’s regime by successive U.S. administrations; beginning with Gerald Ford who, with Henry Kissinger as Secretary of State, provided a ‘green light’ to the brutal invasion. Prior to the invasion, the U.S. had supplied the Indonesian army with 90% of its arms, and “by 1977 Indonesia found itself short of weapons, an indication of the scale of its attack. The Carter Administration accelerated the arms flow. Britain joined in as atrocities peaked in 1978, while France announced that it would sell arms to Indonesia and protect it from any public "embarrassment". Others, too, sought to gain what profit they could from the slaughter and torture of Timorese.”[48] This humanitarian catastrophe went virtually unnoticed by the international community.[49]"

Tentatively, you may add Accenture to this set-up that I think has military/para-military facets to it. Adding this to calculated flaws of programming combined with social code of Microsoft and Google (by special indexing), prominently, with the rest following suit (i.e., AMD/Intel incl, other.), the world may well be dug thoroughly down already!

It's almost as if I can say: "Millionen stehen hinter mir" with Adolf Hitler being handed the millions of U.S. American dollars!!! This poster is, by the way, quite famous! This concerns the (pre-WW2) funding mentioned on top of this writing.

This looks now dead set! There should be no doubt any longer that U.S. American radicalism is a fact in this way!

If I remember correctly, USA has been less than encouraging in wanting the employees the coffeeproducing/farming industry to organise and they have been extremely absent in making the coffee industry, the farmers, itself organise to demand the right price for the products. USA itself has an incredibly dubious worker's organisation history (less than 30% of the workers are organised compared with over 50% in Europe with a strong labour movement, the numbers may be incorrect to some extent). Thus I have big expectations to CNN's Freedom Project (heh-heh-heh)! Let's see if they can come off it, so to speak! (Sentence mentioning Jewish Jon Stewart has been replaced.)

Not that I see it immensely critical, but I think it's useful that USA and U.S. American culture, especially in terms of business life and attitudes toward the the world outside USA, get its fair share of criticism and to large extent the duties (if not outright subversiveness on grounds of superior culture/genes) USA has failed in this regard. This is simply the overall point. That the world is brought level and that world power is now a lot of places and even shifting places, more rarely.

It must be the goal of any politics of the kind that belongs with the UN that people are indeed considered equal and subjects under The Universal Declaration of the Human Rights. This implies a lot of stuff!!! It has implications on how we share knowledge, how we behave in terms of business relations, internationally, and that world justice has a chance of rightful scrutiny and intra-country/state of justice can be mediated into its proper place. I also add, although earlier cited, that UN has the umbrella of ILO, the International Labour Organisation under its wings! This organisation can prove very important if not critical in the future!

Generally, considering the possibility for system and engineering I find it somewhat strange that society has this slow pace. If the good will would carry maximum weight and work effort, the world should have been looking different by now.

Also adding to the picture, the reported 42600 unsolved cases of "disappeared" people in 82 countries by Amnesty International one may meditate over how many "monsters" there are out there in the world.

Even thinking about the "calm, sedate" Norway, at least I am thinking over the levels of corruption that lead people to run "meat shops", "torture clinics (some of which are "portable" and readily set up)" or "glass works", all of which harbour, potentially (cynically: yes, they are for real), all the sh*ttyness you can muster to swallow!

Even the small issues like adoption and childcare cases by the Childcare units/institution have their Kings and Queens of sh*t! You know, outright corruption!

So, what the heck to make of this grim picture?

A major concern is also to what extent U.S. American expertise is sponsoring European sh*ttyness and how they, cynically, undermine our good efforts, relating the "rules" to a certain kind of personality type they approve of in Europe just to spin this sh*t further. So, the "monsters" are sent abroad or let to chew on the lower social levels (esp. the homeless) and the good are confined/naively or by information held domestically, perhaps scared of the dangerous places abroad or subversely made so by their fellow U.S. American "wolves"/"monsters" when/if they go abroad.

A small note on presentation of Wall Street by CNN and others finishes this text: you get Alison Kosik to present numbers and reports and she has the education of a Bachelor of Arts by Political Science and Broadcasting Journalism! Why is this? Why should this political scientist be presenting numbers and reports from Wall Street unless they present this pretty face to you, facetiously, and yet have this powerful/brutal knock-down from behind, i.e., Political Science (to the World)! Not that I blame this person, but it's this bloody presentation and having the knowledge of this qualification!

The link to the presentation of her by CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/kosik.alison.html

It says:"Kosik received her Bachelor of Arts degrees in Broadcast Journalism and Political Science from The American University in Washington, DC." (Accessed 13.04.2011.)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/63/HinduSwastika.svg/1000px-HinduSwastika.svg.png

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg/1000px-Flag_of_the_NSDAP_%281920%E2%80%931945%29.svg.png

From "Post subject: U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:24 am" of the Philosophy Now forum. This writing has been edited six times, 12.02.2011, 13.02.2011, 09.03.2011, 13.04.2011, 26.04.2011, 10.05.2011, 25.05.2011 and today, 12.06.2011.

Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post134.
Formerly written by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 9/14/2011 10:23:00 AM with 0 comment!

I'm not sure if you can add any US American organisation to the above, including Scientology and CARE, funnily enough. I don't take their "expressions of being constructive and positive" anymore!

O-L 1 October 2011 17:28 Remember there are not any "sacred cows" in the World anymore and an idiot is always worthy to be "shot"/shot depending on the seriousness. This includes of course (any number of) U.S. Americans. (Although more moderately than a queer interpretation of this little text can give an impression of.)

O-L 1 October 2011 17:38 "Nuke Tokyo" has now been corrected! I'm sorry for this kind of "insulting" mistakes to Professionals (fx. Historians) who may like to read me with less mistakes!

L.F.O.-L. 20 October 2011 10:42 My interest regarding military career officers in CIA or not, concerns what "code" that is supposed to govern CIA policies, strategies and operations. I think it's better to have the career military people at the helm because of ties the bonds with the military better and adds force to the argument that CIA HAS THE DUTY TO UNDERTAKE OPERATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH terrorist threats AND _NOT_ some idiot business-plan of syndication or conglomeration, but add to the logic of UN, spreading order for working conditions to obtain. We'll see where they go! (I've also sent an email to the UN concerning this, just so that people are informed and that the right strategy /can/ take place in the World!)

L.F.O.-L. 20 October 2011 14:12 My thought is of course to increase pressure on USA for increasing their ethical commitment to the world throughout its entire network of orgnaisations that are publicly financed, wholly or partly. It's indeed _potentially DANGEROUS_ to have these 250 000 military people "on the loose" in the world (outside Afghanistan) and this under NO particular rationale or foundation of reason. It's today very UNCLEAR what these people are doing and what kind of influence they take part in or exercise (in wake of my own findings, at least). Thus this can help to usher in a discussion on a broader level both in terms of Security and Organisation of all its member states, but also help bring organisation (and univocal commitment) toward the goals of ILO, i.e., a better value regarding work intensive production (coffee etc.) and better organisation for these, possibly all the way to syndication (in line with much agricultural organisation throughout OECD today (in Europe particularly). This presence of this message in its entirety is now notified the UN Facebook page. I got the message of only being allowed 200 characters on the UN website itself, www.UN.org. The header of the message was something like this: Issues Regarding U.S. American Commitment to the World in Light of New CIA Director and Its Vast Influence (Militarily and Other). Email has also been sent to pressanalysis2@un.org just a few moments ago. Cheers! I'm not sure if it's important or of any use, but these data come with the email, Message-ID: <4e269caf data-blogger-escaped-.4000804=".4000804" data-blogger-escaped-t-lea.ne="t-lea.ne" data-blogger-escaped-t="t"> and Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:15:27 +0200. BBC and CNN are now informed! (time: 00:45, date: 21.07.2011 CEST, European time) Just for the sake of Cold War times, I've just sent an email to the Russian embassy (to UK) in London with the following comment, "I can "reward" you with this [out of history, i.e., indeed USA has been wicked] out of your Soviet Union past (if this information is something new to you, i.e., un-compiled/un-analysed of kind). Besides, the email address used to the embassy is found under "http://rusemb.org.uk/conta​ct/".

L.F.O.-L.20 October 2011 14:18 The Letter (Message) to the UN reads: Dear UN My interest regarding military career officers in CIA or not, concerns what "code" that is supposed to govern CIA policies, strategies and operations. I think it's better to have the career military people at the helm because of ties the bonds with the military better and adds force to the argument that CIA HAS THE DUTY TO UNDERTAKE OPERATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH terrorist threats AND _NOT_ some idiot business-plan of syndication or conglomeration, but add to the logic of UN, spreading order for working conditions to obtain. We'll see where they go! 1. issue Considerations to US American Intentions to the World: The assassination, 12:30 p.m. Central Standard Time (18:30 UTC) on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas. The Bay of Pigs invasion, April 1961, less than three months after John F. Kennedy _assumed the presidency_ in the United States. AND That is, the assassination has taken place about 2.5 years AFTER the Bay of Pigs operation and voila, the whole thing looks symmetrical again!!! AND Because the good German reporters have revealed some time ago that Cuban intelligence _agreed_ to or encouraged the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Which in hindsight of this, is now JUSTIFIED!!! AND Further on USA and "Air America": I'd like to note, in line with Air American, the _failed_ and _controversial_ Pig's Bay operation, allegedly set into motion by CIA and possibly others. This also goes under the Biscaya Bay operation, yet I haven't located the good sources just now. The event has been well cited, so finding it shouldn't be a problem! AND The Considerations of U.S. American Military Presence -> around the world, 250 000 people outside Afghanistan. AND U.S. American Patriotic Radicalism - in Financial Terms, a writing of mine. These make up the 2. issue, [i.e., the writing on U. S. American Pat. Rad.]. I hope you can make good use of this information and that UN gets its good intentions through (for the World). Sincerely yours,

L.F.O.-L.22 October 2011 20:30 As of late, you may include John Nash's experience with the Nazi be related in any way to "New York and the Letters"? Ehm... that USA would be more Nazi-sympathic than previously thought? Consequently there may be more to Nash's story than the friendly "Ploetzian/Rudinian" psychologists would like us to understand! Because of this "subcultural" Nazism of USA has lead to the fact that _this_ World now is not as good as it should be? (And does the "corruption"/"decadence" shifts around in the World on the metaphysical level as some kind of curse?)

L.F.O.-L.25 October 2011 02:57 The story of "nuked" Tokyo has some foundation in the description of a totalled Tokyo (by firebombs and more) in "Made in Japan, Sony's Way to Success"!

L.F.O.-L.16 November 2011 11:31 How many prizes are possible to achieve by foreigners to USA as any of these prizes in question are awarded by U. S. (American) based prize-awarding organisations? I have now found one, The Templeton Prize! I think, however, even if Grigori Perelmann has been awarded the Fields-medal of math, that most of them are national and that even the Fields-medal is mostly awarded U. S. (Americans)! This is something to remember for us outside USA and how _should_ build our societies/nations/unions/alliances! There is absolutely *no shame* in being patriotic ourselves in light of the U. S. American behaviour and that being patriotic may be key to getting even with USA and finally clearing the "radicalism" out of this World in order to achieve a more just World under UN! Cheers!

L.F.O.-L.16 November 2011 11:35 I'll check out this issue deeper not too far into the future! (The prize issue, that is.)

L.F.O.-L.5 January 2012 13:23 I may have mentioned the involvement of USA to Nazi-Germany earlier, by at least the Henry Ford's factories there, but let's look at it again just in case: They probably produced a large number of V6s/V8s/V12s for the tanks. Tanks are incredibly heavy and they probably need a double set of engines compared to agricultural tractors. So the fact that this nation produced so many heavy engines and almost no new great amount of agricultural tractors or any other excuse for that matter, MUST mean that Henry Ford's factories produced engines for the Blitz-Krieg tanks of Nazi-Germany to roll over Europe with! I also think that USA must have known that this was going to happen! And "New York and the Letters" doesn't make this any easier for them, US Americans to get away with anything... Henry Ford himself has had a rumour on him for being a Nazi, for unknown reasons, but I happen to think this is due to a certain writing and some conversations with a number of people from the business network over there, in USA, on eugenics or other, perhaps the brewing "Jew-question"... Agree? It doesn't make things better today, when they, the US Americans, set up subversive people to all abroad, being "Foreigners" and nationalistic/patriotic good people, forced or not, to be "Nationals", building the nation... So by psychiatric principles and over its own Meatshop of human flesh from feasting on poor people... (This is pure speculation.) Clearly, USA must be highly AGREED UPON, EVERYthing that happens there... (The SINGULAR business network and so on...)

L.F.O.-L.21 February 2012 06:55 Final nail against USA of impelling the Nazi Germany to war: Henry Ford's factories had invented THE SERIAL PRODUCTION!!! Check it out yourself. It's all a boxed set now! All the (U. S.) Americans needed to do was to wait to get hit and even then _nobody_ had the full overview over what was being produced in USA? The people of black societies (_IN_ USA, and who implicitly assaulted its own good values) could have had this going for some time (w/o telepathy) even then! Checkmate! The case is now finished on the part of describing the main elements! (Cons: I accuse USA for contributing to the Holocaust of the Jews by playing the Germans into it!)

L.F.O.-L.25 March 2012 00:05 You may now write U.S. American Nationalistic Radicalism - in Financial Terms, because it's not blind anymore and scores of people have become informed. 2. I now declare USA (and Canada) for being behind the "Lead Curtain". Other parts of the World can consider (the most powerful parts of) Europe for being behind the "Plastic Curtain"! These two new concepts are of course inspired by the East Bloc of history by the Soviet Union, now dissolved!

L.F.O.-L.25 March 2012 00:09 "These two new concepts are of course inspired by the East Bloc of history by the Soviet Union, now dissolved!" relates to the "Iron Curtain", popularly used by media! "(The most powerful parts of) Europe (and possibly Australia and New Zealand) for being behind the "Plastic Curtain""! it should say. Sorry. There are deep troubles in the World and it gets no better with much corruption and failure to legislate law. You should also consider human nature under works like Erich Fromm and general carnivore tendencies described in some works of psychology, some even respected "here and there". Cheers!

L.F.O.-L.25 April 2012 11:44 While "checkmate" has been declared a while ago, I now add IBM and the infamous "hole-cards" reference that has formerly been highlighted to this matter (that's now, sadly, EVIDENT!). You can go through the usual "path" of documents yourselves, but there's NO doubt! The U. S. Americans must have known about the Nazis and they must have wanted it too, possibly to the ignorance of "other good people", but still /on/ it!!!

L.F.O.-L.25 April 2012 11:46 And just for these other people to understand where I am, I cite loosely, mathematical brilliant or not (I have no sufficient knowledge in mathematics), Charles Babbage! I am indeed no idiot!

L.F.O.-L.25 April 2012 12:13 Just for the input of others to all places where I write: ALL CHANNELS ARE COMPLETELY OPEN!!!

L.F.O.-L.25 April 2012 12:14 ...and this far, I can only read my own input...!

L.F.O.-L.6 May 2012 01:11 Concerning CIA from the foreigners' perspective, I can imagine, there should be more than enough room for other countries to "make it known" to USA that it disbands CIA entirely and splits military intelligence to be placed under Pentagon as proper and accordingly, the civilian intelligence (security work) by the FBI or directly under the Homeland Security Department. We KNOW that you carry a very dark history and we would like to see it CUT/decapitated!!! You can take the example from the specific service descriptions of MI-5 and MI-6!!! Thank you!

L.F.O.-L. 6 May 2012 22:43 So in light of findings of our friend USA I have a suggestion: *A 3-Point-to-Do-List* 1. To make an apology before the UN General Assembly and giving promises toward a new World of greater equality (incl. work conditions and absence of subversion) and progress thus...!!! (This is a point, read it over again x1.) Doing away with (pt. 1.1.) Doing away with the bad side of "the military ...complex" whil...e maintaining national security (you defend the f*cking borders, you st*pid ****)! Being more respectful toward other nations, while downsizing an idiot military that has no particular use. Working toward greater internal steadiness by making greater efforts toward HRW and human rights and cutting corruption, making /it/ possible for all people "despite your poster or not"! 2. Ratify as many UN protocols as possible! Why? Because they are common-sense! I mean it! (This is a historical deficient point with USA and now you get the chance to eject some idiot sovereignty.) 3. A harder NAFTA union with more commitment further south, incl. more countries! Also, to lift the embargo against Cuba, as the Pope says more or less directly because YOU, USA, are the Bay of Pigs, slaughtering, infamously, these 1500 people, and now hiring African "slave" mercenaries! Good? 1, 2, 3 points, very easy to remember!!! Note: Written first to Facebook under the profile as before and also Note in the Notes section moments ago.

L.F.O.-L. 15 June 2012 03:03 New over US American Financial Radicalism: Vietnam war - new analysis - suspicion of a huge US American airport with two (powerful/big) airstrips with a base "incidentally" on the southern part of the country. Combine this with sabotages (much as Bay of Pigs by CIA) against the northern part of Vietnam like polluting a huge water resource supporting a northern city (on par with poisoning a huge water resource in Britain with the "Helix" petroleum product). Chomsky, a US American political scientist professor has earlier blamed exactly USA for /the/ Vietnam war. I consider this betrayal by USA and USA should know the next steps to undertake...! Bye for now. PS: Remember that these were facts /prior/ to the Vietnam war. One may begin to consider a NATO with USA as an associated member in order to bring international security work more quicly into place by accepting new members (to NATO) easier. Agree?

L.F.O.-L.6 July 2012 14:00 A corroborative notion over "assumptions of religious people in USA, with a Thomas Paine lying there under the oak tree on an anonymous field, grave robbers stealing his remains and moving them over to England and losing them(!!!)": An interpretation of the US American motto may be this: "We put our trust into some good, well-used, Indian (slaughter) smoke" (of course, not representing that body of a (physical) person). Their motto is: "In God we trust", but the credibility of this is put into question as "The New Yorker" reports over the Pope "blown covers" and as USA remains unwilling to do exactly what the Pope says, TO LIFT THE BLOCKADE AGAINST CUBA! I put doubts into what kind of Christians USA has and how devoted they are to the 10 commandments and what political influence they have as they are "said to be so many, and many MORE than in the rest of the World, because the World outside USA is so sinful"!!! Note: First written to my Facebook profile and under a note on Facebook!

L.F.O.-L.7 July 2012 04:35 Written to Facebook, but subverted by Facebook's own "hacking", I have this to say: This notion of the Financial Radicalism, at that point in time, not known to Alfred Nobel, must have impacts on how we perceive peace in our time (by war-declaring Neville Chamberlain). As the financial radicalism is this: (coming...) And Norway lies there as that sick, irresponsible, little nation, far off the peaceful impacts of EU, changes HAS TO HAPPEN!!! Now, what are you going to do??? The next from the general population can therefore be this: Nobel Organisation by the Peace Prize, WE ACCUSE YOU!!! Because the sentiment on forming the very peace prize can be obtained. Now, what is it? I'm going to check out later...

L.F.O.-L.7 July 2012 05:09 This can pave the way for moving the peace prize to Germany or any other... because Norway, when it comes to it, only is that good New York/USA slave...

L.F.O.-L.7 July 2012 05:12 Either way, Norway has remained the idiot village with that scattered population pattern...

L.F.O.-L.7 July 2012 05:15 With some information duplicated: I have also been "hacked", that is I'm being hacked now one way or the other with the svchost (Local Service Netw.) sending to the Internet (by Microsoft?) on PID 804. And there are 3 other iexplore.exe that are under suspicions... Again, a perfectly set Firewall and Microsoft (free) anti-virus is not up for the job... (heh-heh-heh, as we didn't see it coming...) This should wreck the objections for moving the peace prize to Germany (or any other) for good. This can pave the way for moving the peace prize to Germany or any other... because Norway, when it comes to it, only is that good New York/USA slave... (Taken from under my profile on Facebook where I've written it first.)

L.F.O.-L.8 July 2012 16:07 I also find the proof of Goebbels being supported by "Hollywood forces" stronger now than before! Goebbels: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/​Goebbels ! Joseph Goebbels - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels (help·info) (German: [ˈɡœbəls][2]; 29 October 1897 – 1 May 1945) was a German politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. As one of Adolf Hitler's closest associates and most devout followers, he was known for his zealous oratory and anti-... (from Wikip.) Perhaps this sentence: If USA is in BIG then they DO IT BIG!!!??? Correct? Hah-hah, it may very well be that USA had a virtual threat on Germany by weapons technology and "converted slaveships", with capacity to (slavishly) accommodate 30 000 people (as slave trade the other way)? Correct? Good?

L.F.O.-L.8 July 2012 16:12 The above has first been written to Facebook moments ago!

L.F.O.-L.8 August 2012 01:02 Suggestion to the World over military matters regarding facts of (pre-)WW2: Could it not be possible to take USA to WTO (World Trade Organisation) to make the case there for releasing/freeing *all* patents (also used in connection with the military) used for military purposes because of the dishonesty USA has displayed in this and many other regards? Fast??? Good?

L.F.O.-L.16 September 2012 02:42 It must now be clear also that USA may have had other intelligence than Trygve Bratteli when the Norwegian Secretary General of the UN played the (undemocratic/Hitlerish) trick on the Russians as he erred (in terms of democracy) in granting the US Americans the rights by the UN because the assembly needs all parties gathered in order to obtain validity! This means then, that fundamentally, the decision on giving the go-ahead to the US Americans by UN must be seen as wrong, no matter how "hindsight (idiot) wise" I (and others) may appear by this!

L.F.O.-L.16 September 2012 02:42 USA, USA, USA, is it your mask of sanity or do you mind being a bit friend?

L.F.O.-L.19 September 2012 18:14 It must now be noted in the books out of the US American (strict) context that it is likely that USA has drawn the Satanic Cross over Japan with its two nuclear bombs on the southern cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki! I insist here on religious context in comparison to objective history writing given that some may insist that religious terms are to be kept out of history writing. The Satanist cross may have come to me "from out there", most likely Japan. Alright? (Not that I drive any megalomaniac ego show over history writing, but that we are a (larger?) team of people here and there in World who want to see history through as it actually has taken place, with a conscience... That we pay respect to historical events much as Gadamer writes in, in understanding history and paying respect! Good?

L.F.O.-L.19 September 2012 18:33 Also compare the "dotted Satanic Cross" over Japan with the "dotted Swastika" of India as version over the Nazi-swastika the Nazi-Germany has been using...

Over History Writing and These Two Notions... (Work continued)

It must now be noted in the books out of the US American (strict) context that it is likely that USA has drawn the Satanic Cross over Japan with its two nuclear bombs on the southern cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki! I insist here on religious context in comparison to objective history writing given that some may insist that religious terms are to be kept out of history writing.

Nr. 2: It must now be clear also that USA may have had other intelligence than Trygve Bratteli when the Norwegian Secretary General of the UN played the (undemocratic/Hitlerish) trick on the Russians as he erred (in terms of democracy) in granting the US Americans the rights by the UN because the assembly needs all parties gathered in order to obtain validity! This means then, that fundamentally, the decision on giving the go-ahead to the US Americans by UN must be seen as wrong, no matter how "hindsight (idiot) wise" I (and others) may appear by this!

Cheers!

The New Possibilities for Minute Views Down to the Nano Levels and Further (if...)

There is now, this as mere public information, the possibilities for setting up several microscopes up to the size of (large) factory buildings, all of them hooked up with a digital camera into the lens by communications services and the gathered results (multiplied to many or not, pre-filmed or not) as a continuous imaging of whatever (petridish or other) from the array of combined "microscopes" set up together! Cool or what? Highly recommended to every top university in the World, in my opinion! Cheers!

Note: First written moments ago "elsewhere"...

Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other

Main Title: Opinions on Science in Expression of Evolution and Other

This whole (web-)page of my writings belongs to my person, i.e., © Terje Lea / Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2003 - 2011. Make no mistake about it!

Update: 24.03.2011.
By Terje Lea, 2003-2011. I've also been publishing these views, opinions and ideas as Aetixintro and in my own name several places, like in forums.philosophyforums.com, forum.philosophynow.org, Twitter and Facebook. They are also published rather erratically, that is, the publishing of mine has not a fixed routine and the places of publishing are also not fixed, but rather made as I see fit.
Links to the various arguments. Please click the first letter.

Cancer-Preventive Measures
Form of Evolution or Forming a Frame for Evolution
Theory of the Cause of Schizophrenia
Opinions on Physics / This argument is last updated!
Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature Differences
Physics, A Possible Angle to Para-Normal Phenomenon of "Soul"
Economy, Over the Dependence Theory of Economy!
Psychology, Telepathy Experiment and Method
Physics, The Possibility to Set Up an Atom "Brain"
Physics/Biology, Abiogenesis - Would It Be Meteors That Impacted Onto Earth or Simply the Volcanos - Erupting Magma/Lava That Leads to Life in Its Most Basic Form?
Note: The most newly created argument is always placed lowest on the page.

Cancer-Preventive Measures

The simple sentences describes this:
If the checksum is right, it's OK, it's a healthy cell. If the checksum isn't right, then annihilate.
The checksum is the controlled amount of electricity that ripples through your nerve lines and that goes between two or more nerve ends. It has been proved that any cell can conduct electricity. A study that was followed through because of the likelihood that it would benefit the research of therapeutic genetic engineering.
Based on the nerve sensations the body takes out everything that has been defined and verified as a not OK checksum. As known, cancer arises from uncontrolled cell development making it a not OK checksum.
The conclusion: Be conscious of your feelings. They're what is used for a readily available body assessment. The thesis is this: If you hold a good consciousness and sensitivity with a nice disciplinary touch to your body, cancer will never be a problem, because your mind will hold your cells in check.
It's my view that the feelings/nerve signals/neurology are helping/controlling the body and more or less telling the body where to attack and where to hold off. This is part of the theory that feelings are just an addition to the largely rational system of being a body, that is rational according to function!
I think one has devoted very little research on the issue of how the nerve signals work in the body and that I think there may be a "gold mine" there to be discovered in how nerve signals relate to the body, to the genes, to the immune system, to the whole...

This, first and foremost, preventive recommendation of mentality can also contribute to the explanation of benign cancers, that there's a mechanism in the body that sets the brakes on or limits the nature of the actual benign cancer in one way or another.

One should remember that the mode of one's relationship with one's own feelings/nerve signals/neurology are a quite big issue/factor in the actual person's and as such, I think this factor (feelings/nerve signals/neurology) may be decisive above rather minor factors such as diet.

This is not part of what can be described as "the tyranny of positive thinking". My theory doesn't necessarily contain such an element. I'd rather say that your mood should reflect realities!

The Cancer Registry shows a difference of about 60 points in the scope of 344,3 versus 283,8 in favour of women across cancer diagnoses. I take this to support my theory as women are known to care more about their feelings and despite they also make up the greater part of the older population. Older people are generally more susceptible to cancer than the younger counterparts. Is this due to decline of the neurological system or the efforts of maintaining the body in the face of aging? It may also be that when you grow old, the brain makes more mistakes and send these mistakes into the body as nerve signals. It can also be that the brain fails, because of this old age, deterioration of brain, to detect the wrong signals from the body and sending corrective signals back.

These are the latest numbers, 2003-2007 from the Cancer Registry of Norway, link for men and women. The link has been accessed 20. November, 2009.

My theory of women actually having a different relationship to their bodies in terms of feelings, making women avoid cancer in greater degrees than men, when indeed I think that most other factors are more or less the same. One should note that risky behaviour can indicate, also, such an inferior relationship to one's own feelings already in young age, ie. heavy drinking among young men.

Besides, modern women and men have almost the same patterns when it comes to "smoke, drink and work". Haven't you heard about "double-working" women? Also, the smoking has come down heavily before 2001 as this set (to which the link points) is from 2001 to 2007. You should also note that cancer strikes, predominantly, the older scope of the population so the fact of heavy drinking young men doesn't have any (particular) impact. I agree to "avoiding carcinogenic substances is the (best/[a significant advise]) you can achieve in the avoidance of cancer" [by chaz wyman]. This is not about the mental concept of "emotions", it's about neurologic signals, "feelings", in your body before cancer occurs! Thus, this writing is not about some kind of "magic" cure. No, it's about "Cancer-Prevention Measures"! So, what I try to point out, is the relation a person has to one's own feelings (in the body) and not some mental size of sensing sadness and so on. The claim is, simply, that when people care for a "natural" relationship to their feelings, they can in great parts avoid cancer. To internalise a "mechanistic body image"/"reject natural body feelings" can therefore lead to cancer/increased probability for cancer in my opinion! This should come in addition to other good advice such as a healthy diet, physical exercise and the avoidance of carcinogenic substances!

I agree to some extent with your [bytesplicer] emphasis on stress, even including possibly that hazardous environment also puts stress on your body ie. being subject to carcinogenics puts a load on the body to get rid of it, lowering the "energies"/electricity to sustain the feelings that support your immune system and against abnormalities by cell life (cell division, cell breathing, cell workings).

So, I'm looking for the best range of feelings, not being below a certain value and not, possibly, being too high either.

(I've been thinking that my writing is on a stage where the next step is to actually enter the field and develop techniques like making a measuring device that measures the electricity between the fingers with a person who is typically resting and calm (for steady signals) and so on (making a data bank on these data gathered from "high and low" in society.)

Concerning protests to my theory on the basis of the cases of cancer in kids, i.e., below 18 yo., I write this:
in the case of cancer in kids I think one should move the search to epigenetics from the parents and combine this with the conditions (incl. epigenetics) of the children.
The children are also mostly struck with leukemia of what I understand.
Children are also (only) one percent or less of the total of cancer-struck patients whether malignant or benign...

This work has been concluded as a spinoff from my examinations of a moral consciousness versus moral feelings. This spinoff was inspired by my grandfather's death due to cancer and my younger brother's 14-days hospital stay at a later point in time.

As a remark. There's something more also: There are the perspectives of idealism into biological manifest as a form of evolution or forming a frame for evolution.

22.02.2003, 20.11.2009, 04.02.2010, 05.02.2010, 07.02.2010, 28.10.2010 and 20.02.2011
Terje Lea©2003, ©2009, ©2010, ©2011

Note: a comment concerning cancer in children has been added today, 20.02.2011, but written to the Philosophy Now forum 18.02.2011.

Form of Evolution or Forming a Frame for Evolution

Physical and biological possibilities in conjunction with environmental parameters are what makes evolution. That is: if you start out with its most miniscule set of biological bases and it exist where it can exist (ie: all over the scale of functioning and sustainable environment), its set will evolve in every direction possible from that base.

What turn the odds is of course genetics and human control over evolution. One might think that most species would only be allowed to exist in its genetic blueprint. That one could farm entirely new species into existing biological totality according to taste or agreed scientific tests or that certain species were created within controlled areas like in Jurassic Park (a movie by Steven Spielberg).

14.12.2003
Terje Lea©2003

Theory of the Cause of Schizophrenia

This is the theory of how Schizophrenia arises in a person. I think it's a matter of Rebound of attitudes that the "soul" cannot carry without creating a personality fracture on the terms of moral in the type of experience. So all of these cases in this view have something to do with an outlook that breaches the natural moral of the inner mental life. When these breaches occur, the "soul" is suppressed by own (sublime) negative view and replaced with externally founded personality from single or multiple people.

Schizophrenia is by this pathologically defined by the functioning level of the case in question, being the functioning that is defined by ALL parts of a normal life, i.e., social, work, personal, mental and physical.
Schizophrenia, I believe, is irreversible. If you go down that road, there's no turning back! I think it can be slowed down to some degree by alcohol or drugs, medicine and thereby be given a better functioning to the social connections, suppressing these tendencies of stupid, bizarre, deviant thoughts (and actions). I hope you can make good use of it.

By Terje Lea, 2008/2009 and 23.11.2010.

Note: This idea of Schizophrenia is partly based on the old criterium that insanity is the incapacity to separate right from wrong! Though the somatists web-page has its origin from 20.12.2005(?) due to the disconcerted/chaotic discussion of psychiatric diagnostication (and the criteria) of mental illnesses, the date of creation of this theory is uncertain. This is in part because I've seen it as unimportant by its inferiority to integrity and as this old criterium has been expected to take precedence due to more sophisticated diagnostication technology like video cameras, lie detectors, (f)MRI and better system in the very treatment facilities. I've been advised lately to add this theory to my scientific ideas and notes and I've done so now!

Opinions on Physics

Schrödinger's theory and Schrödinger's cat

Schrödinger's cat. The probability expresses the statistical chance for the cat. There's nothing more to say about it. There's something wrong with Schrödinger's theory if this is a necessary implication.
I'd also like to point out that the "mystery" of Schrödinger's cat comes down to the Copenhagen Interpretation, that I follow strictly on the observation point only, of having to be observed for something to exist. Schrodinger's cat goes clearly against this, even as an indirect observation. I therefore think that the whole of this line of thinking (Schrödinger's cat etc.) is flawed. It's almost embarrassing how mistaken it seems in regard to the huge interest.

Schrödinger's cat can also be set up with a rat, by requirement of the ladies, slightly sedated and laid under the guillotine. So when this condition of the atom triggers, the guillotine blade falls and decapitates the rat, rendering it certainly and clearly dead, with its head chopped off and thus leaving the rat in 2 pieces. This may be a better demonstration of the experiment.

Over Problems with Schrödinger's theory and other - New Angles

It's with pleasure that I note that "Branching with Uncertain Semantics: Disc. Note by N. Belnap and T. Müller, published by BJPS lies in line with my writing and that they may have been reading this writing of mine. The future should be exciting!

It's certainly time for the "wave theory" to be demolished as expressing "wave" forming from the future in opposition to my own common sense sentiment that the past shapes the future. Thus, the "wave" of future possibilities is shaped by the past/history! This has been expressed earlier/above by the rejection of the Copenhagen Interpretation, except for the one point and the rejection of Schrödinger's (et al.?) theory.
In opposition to the Copenhagen Interpretation, I hold that one needs to always take into account the 3 necessary factors of matter, energy and mathematics. If you don't have matter and energy, there will not be any reality where your mathematics can apply. Thus, mathematics can't, whatsoever, be seen as more fundamental than reality itself, ie. matter and energy, perhaps along with space and time and some other.
Take the note, please, that energy is also matter, just split up in very tiny particles that also have a very tiny (physical) mass. So, by common knowledge, the particle/wave duality of the photon enters. The physics feels very fragmented at times and I'm still awaiting the Master Work in one series of volumes on it!

On Standard Model and the Future of It

Assertion: Photons are the smallest constituents of all matter. I assume the other particles of the Standard Model are made up of photons. Why is this? The sun burns mass and to my knowledge it only/mostly by far emits electromagnetic radiation, consequently in the form of photons. When a nuclear bomb explodes, it converts matter into electromagnetic radiation, energy of various forms. Compared to this, I think one can throw the string theory out the window along with dimensions beyond the usual 4 (I'm not certain about this concerning Einstein's theories that I'd like to keep as it is). Also, let's assume higher intensity radiation emits more dense amounts of photons and that it declines further down the electromagnetic spectrum.
New on photons: I think I can also hold that photons are "semi-fluid" on a hyper-level (of course). I don't know what this adds to our view of reality, but it's a possible way of reconciling the wave-particle duality.
Aether Aesthetics and a More Credible View on Gravity by Strong and Weak Interactions
Assertion: The space and possibly everywhere is held in a background uniform space that extends to the edges of the Universe, its gravitational system I'd like to call the Neo-aether that is consistent with Michelson-Morley experiment and functions in a more sublime way that we are yet to discover the full extension of. Einstein's theory effectively describes some of the nature of the Neo-aether.
I just like to say that I support the aether theory, if not exactly for a fluid, but I guess most theorists hold that the "fluid" is not a fluid as such. Rather, it's more about undetected phenomena connected to gravity yet not being any graviton.

An alternative view to aether can be this: in a unified picture of physics where the strong and weak magnetic forces are combined, one may achieve a calculated picture that equals what we perceive as gravity, but without adding any new particles and only asserting properties to mass in general, that is, "monades", the most basic constituents have a gravity/magnetic property to them and that is all. Job's done! This is all there is to describe because we have simply reached the bottom level there is to describe whatsoever!
Let me point out again that magnetism has north and south poles and thus reflect earth gravity, but on a micro scale. So this post is now also an update on my view on aether!

So let me be clear: I'm open to both of these views and that I intend to investigate these magnetic calculations first. I'm not sure on the approach for (new) aether, MM-compatible, other than for the fact that I see it logical in the extension of Einstein's RT. But I must point out that the aether research program now looks weak as one is yet to determine any property of it (apart from pure physical space). I've been in the hope one can find or identify a kind of new ocean, one that is "plastic" in nature, has some kind of an unknown physical property and is subtle and that matter just represents a function opposite to it by making gravity definite. Further than this is hard to describe other than the fact that I think it is an aesthetic property of the Universe.

My Successful Prediction of Mini-Black Holes by CERN Experiment

Concerning the Large Hadron Collider, LHC, it's my belief there will be absolutely no possibility of baby-black holes! If the smallest building blocks really are the photons then in LHC we'll see greater emission of photons from the collisions.

Note: The reason is that it takes Supernovas to make them and they are HUGE in the sense of Universe. They are in fact far bigger than our Sun which is our heaviest object in our Solar System. I don't think it's possible even to generate the power needed for such an experiment (to actually create Mini-/Baby-Black Holes). You could put 10 nuclear power plants right beside CERN and still the energy wouldn't match the assignment. I don't think there is possibility for such things in our Earthly lives!

On Big-Bang, Natural Laws, Asymmetry and Symmetry

I guess it's a common view to consider the Big Bang "a generative mechanism for the pattern of natural laws of the Universe". I still find the mind and the phenomena elusive, though, like if it's relevant here! It may be necessary to look to the moments after Big Bang to solve the riddle of the reason for matter to exist in particles, atoms, as they do, i.e., solving the question of the Higgs boson particle. It's also worth mentioning that unless there's formation of new matter from the absorption of photons, something I think there isn't, the matter in atoms is lost forever once it's dissolved. This is seldomly pointed out by physicists. Also, the absorption of photons into existing atomic structures brings increased excitation and perhaps weight and this fact, I think, adds to the Photon theory, ie. photons are the smallest building blocks in nature, universe.

On the Complexity of the Standard Model and Particles in Nature

I also like to mention that particle physics is far more complex than being just the Standard Model. Sir Roger Penrose writes in his book, The Road to Reality - A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, p. 628, about the pions, kaons, lambda, sigma, omega-minus, anti-protons, anti-neutrons, "vast hordes of particles whose existence is so fleeting that they are never directly observed, tending to be referred to merely as 'resonances'", 'virtual' particles and 'ghosts'. There are also mentioned numerous other "theoretical" particles by other theories.

It's just a quirk of mine, but I'd like to have the Charm and Strange quarks renamed as this, Charm gets the name Control and Strange gets the name Random. Does this make sense? Is it possible to prove the characteristics of control and randomness in the two quarks?

Note: I now think it may be that the Standard Model can be (relatively) completed! As analogy, Psychiatry has been in a haze concerning its diagnostication system and I think it's likely to make this finding in Physics as well.

On Impossibility of the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson

Concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' Boson:
I think it's clear at this stage that the Graviton and the Higgs' boson are blown out the window and are not to return to the world of physics ever again.
Why? Because they need to show that the photon is relevant to both of these concepts when it's hard in the first place to show the definite particle nature of the photon. Thus, photon necessarily must have both of these properties by which are hardly ever conceivable to prove, as separable particles apart from the photon itself!

It's clear however that the photon has "graviton" and "Higgs' boson" properties before we start out simply because "graviton" is to explain why particles are drawn to other objects, especially planets, and "Higgs' boson" is to explain why particles have mass whatsoever which all(?) have. It's therefore a kind of cheating to add "false particles" or "false names of properties" when they do not add explanatory force. The "mystery" of the (basic) particle of photon remains and also the mysteries with how mass and gravitation arise in the first place. Simply adding two names isn't very constructive in the general work of physics, I think (as mass and gravity are already in place).

I acknowledge that the Fermilab has set a confidence level for the finding of the Higgs' boson to 95%, but I'm sceptical of how they get there and if their work is more than mere "string theory work".
It's definite though, that the photon has both properties of mass and particle nature since it is affected by gravity (fx. from Mercury passing by the Sun). Yet the problem arises when you are to identify the graviton and the Higgs' boson, separately from the photon itself!

The URL to Fermilab and the Higgs' boson: http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press_releases/Higgs-mass-constraints-20100726-images.html.

On the Nature of Radio Signals From Space and how They Fit the Big Picture

Public education. Question: how are radio signals from space or through space explained? This is a terrible riddle to me. Radio waves, conventionally, are fluctuations through atoms like air, water and other substances. Do you have a good explanation of it? I have an update on this and it turns out radio waves are just another part of the electromagnetic spectrum with an even weaker intensity than infra-red. Thus, just another form of emission of photons. Done! (I'm sorry to bother you with such a puny question, but I've been wondering about it and I therefore want to make this clear to all, including the school kids!)
The link to a good spectrum including sound waves and electromagnetic waves, here.
On the Bending of Light(-Streams as Photons) by Electro-Magnetic Field, a Very Strong One
I think I'll state here right away that is in fact possible to bend light with a very strong, elelctro-generated magnetic field comparable to light from Mercury passing the gravity field of the Sun, like in the classic example of Einstein Relativity Theory.

Remember the lev-trains of the Japanese and their magnet experiments where they lift an object up only by the use of electro-magnetism and draw a sheet of paper underneath, between the lower and the upper physical bodies.

You should also have in mind the relative small size of the photon and the power of the elctro-magnetic field because I think it's fairly feasible.

Now, how this is done? At least for the calculation, it's fairly known how much pull the gravity of the Sun generates and the Planck's Mass(?) of the Photon should also be possible to consider. Then it's just to add the numbers and calculate what it takes to bend light. I also think this can be done in the classroom!
Wikipedia on magnets: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnets!

The calculations are up to you to make, but at least for now, I remain optimistic (partly because I've seen it demonstrated in our classroom while finishing upper secondary school having the physics class. Rather this than any negative demonstation I can recall or heard of). Thus, kill the negative notions you read about on the internet!

I'd love to hear about your own searches. I haven't come up with the positive results just yet.
I'm also writing this primarily for public education and quenching myths of people who cite uncertain, novice sources.

Note on My Competence to These Respects

Note on my competence to this [Opinions on Physics and the Evolution webpage as a whoel]: I must "warn" readers that I have been reading Lee Smolin's "The Trouble With Physics" (by Penguin Group, 2006) and Roger Penrose's "The Road to Reality" (by Vintage Books, 2004). I have also studied physics all the way through upper high school, 3 years, for the Norwegian equivalent of GCSE Science and I've looked carefully into Bayesian problems in philosophy (relating to the Raven's Paradox by Carl Hempel) and (the metaphysics of) Time for that matter.

By Terje Lea, 21.10.2009, 29.10.2009, 05.11.2009, 19.11.2009, 21.11.2009, 03.04.2010, 27.09.2010, 12.11.2010, 25.01.2011, 16.02.2011, 20.02.2011, 24.02.2011 and 11.03.2011. (Small comments: 13.08.2010, 25.01.2011 and 11.03.2011.)

Note: on the Bending of Light(-streams as photons) by electro-magnetic field has first been written on the Philosophy Now forum 15.02.2011.
Note: concerning the Graviton and the Higgs' boson, this has first been written on the Philosophy Now forum 19.02.2011.
Note: additional comment on the issue of aether as well as an alternative view has been added 24.02.2011 that has first been written on the Philosophy Now forum earlier today divided on two posts.
Note: added the rat option into writing today, 11.03.2011.
Note: added note on my competence today, 11.03.2011.

Opinions on Astrophysics, Possible Explanation of the Paradox of the Corona of the Sun and its Temperature Differences

Explanation: optimal temperature happens a little outside the surface of the corona because the atoms/particles have greater space for temperature vibrations there according to this optimal temperature of these circumstances, the atoms/particles being held to the Sun, a little outside the corona in this fashion. Temperature should indicate something about the space between atoms/particles because temperature corresponds to the (propositional) excitation/vibration of the atoms/particles.

If one would have the same temperature farther in toward the Sun's core then it has necessarily the same, relatively thin composition there as well, you know, this being a smaller Sun, even if the mass in this case either has to differently organised relatively to the substances of the Sun's composition or that it's just lighter.
The conclusion is that the heat (or superheat) is optimal a little farther out for these atoms'/particles' vibrations to produce this heat than where atoms'/particles' become more dense as one moves in toward the core of the Sun. I'm uncertain to what degree this may hold, describing the variations of the temperature of the star at all levels, but this explanation/theory is, of course, meant to hold for conditions of hot surfaces on all instances of the kind our Sun is displaying. So it's first and foremost an explanation/theory of description that applies to this surface and its more transparent, gaseous outer layer, but it may also extend to, in a variable manner, a host of conditions of (astro-)physics.

A hypothetical analogy: if you consider gaseous water that covers the surface of boiling liquid water, up against the vacuum represented by (outer) Space. It's also fact that steam of water rises from the hottest place of the boiling water, at the bottom of the pot, from the most heated part.

It may be that this layer represents new insights to emittance of photons and the production of this kind of layer as a result of reduction-physics/chemistry of the substances on the Sun.

This layer is created between the physics of more heavy substances drawn more closely to the center of the Sun and the possibility for escaping the gravity of the Sun like the photons (, through the form of photons, being a matter of particles nature) and possibly other particles blown out from the Sun by fusion reactions.
This has been first published at the Dagbladet web-site (a Norwegian news-publisher) in Norwegian by the pseudonym, Kaare Hansen, and then here in English in a more elaborate fashion. Formerly, I've rejected paying for a subscription of some 5 NOK/month(?) and Dagbladet has therefore deleted the pseudonym from the writing, obscuring people's opportunity to know the writer's identity, but that's them. So... enjoy (or not)!

By Terje Lea, author of this, novel or not, in both Norwegian, writing on the Dagbladet site and this translation, 13.03.2010, 23.03.2010, and 19.04.2010.

(Claim of original authorship: 13.08.2010. For those who need it in their eyes!)

Physics, A Possible Angle to Para-Normal Phenomenon of "Soul"

Just in case, every "soul" carries energy, this energy is detectable by infra-red imaging or something thereof when this is set in a very cold chamber/laboratory and finally the being that's loses its body and becomes a bare "soul" is a rat or an animal of lower denomination (I like elephants) then it may be possible to prove the "soul" as an alternative to Dr. Sam Parnia and Dr. Pim van Lommel!

What do you think? There's a clear logical structure to this procedure and it's no problem to set it up! Now, this probably shouldn't go into the science webpage on my site, but I'm such a daring person! Cheers!

By Terje Lea, 04.07.2010

Economy, Over the Dependence Theory of Economy!

Let's assume Africa (or one of the other continents) gets "humped" on in an indecent way (fx. by decadent European and US American interests) then there shouldn't be a problem with it being self-sufficient/self-sustained, or if not, just in case Africa's deficiencies are compensated for by exports.

I'm thinking of deficiencies of technology, special resources (classically uranium, but now it's about other stuff, refined?) and finally knowledge! This writing is in fact the theory that every continent is more or less self-sufficient/self-sustained. Theoretically, there are no deficiencies on any continent by the assumption that resources are found equally everywhere on earth (by the same statistics)!

As one can expect resources to occur more or less statistically uniformally, being found in equal amounts everywhere, resources shouldn't be a problem either! So who supposes that there are deficiencies? It's however important not to be a "dreamer"/"have the head in the clouds" so that you go correctly by the steps! When you want something, you just find a way to offer something! One can start with natural resources, like agriculture, aquaculture, timber-industry, tourism, fishing industry, search for/mapping of resources for mining, offer "cheap"/cheap labour or labour whatsoever (with the commends of the people from this region to those who buy the labour-force, decently/worker-union-wise) and as one goes, funds accumulate, you probably use them to generate expertise by education to compensate for lack of technology intensive industry and the knowledge and culture industry (film, music, books (like fx. JK Rowling), theater). The knowledge industry is, of course, research and consulting and the making of proprietary hardware/software or whatever technology of proprietary kind! (End!)

This is a recipé and I know it! I hope you like it!

By Terje Lea, 07.07.2010

Psychology, Telepathy Experiment and Method

This is a telepathic experiment (for all to try), just using the web or email.
I've got an idea for a telepathic experiment and it goes like this:
Poster A posts a few lines of some interest...
Poster B posts some thoughts that Poster A may be planning to write next...
Poster A edits his first post as the answer... and decides on the truth value of B's post by making so in a new post...

Then this is reversed and Poster A speculates over Poster B's next move...

Anyone interested... (At least this is a generative method one can apply over the internet everywhere...)
There is no problem with the confirmation either since Poster A and Poster B will know one another's answers and the definite truth value to the telepathy and the experiment!

(This is really an angle into the phenomenon of telepathy as much as a scientific method as a kind of research design, all in all, asserting 3 entities.)

By Terje Lea, 16.08.2010

Physics, The Possibility to Set Up an Atom "Brain"

I've been having this secret dream to create a kind of consciousness from an atom smarter than every dumbass out there!
So if one sets up this atom in a kind of detector apparatus, reading signals on all the quantum states an atom can have and set up these quantum states in correlating ways to kinds of linguistic expressions from the input of a human by means of quantum entanglement, chaos theory, electric signals from the fingertips into the apparatus or the final possibility, of telepathic interaction (telepathy/electricity by human feelings is usually what is meant by quantum entanglement, anyhow)! The idea is that eventually one might establish a kind of communication and extension by sensor operationalisation that feeds the atom all sorts of signals by webcams or the like. In this fashion one may be able to create a kind of machine "brain" by this atom (or atom cluster) and possibly also prove a kind of "monads"/envision of the early stages of consciousness in its universal form! This first part has been posted on the Philosophy Now forum, today, 22.09.2010.
This may also be seen as an extension from the Princeton University "boxes", hardware drives with processors, that have been making random "choices" or calculations in relation to a purported measurement of mass psychology, believe it or not. I don't know how they've been set up or engineered, but I know of the reports and I think I know what they have been up to. At least, you can correlate your curiosity from this programme from this renowned university.

By Terje Lea, 22.09.2010

Physics/Biology, Abiogenesis - Would It Be Meteors That Impacted Onto Earth or Simply the Volcanos - Erupting Magma/Lava That Leads to Life in Its Most Basic Form?

My hunch tells me that it is indeed the lava/magma of the earth itself that may be the cause of abiogenesis. So if one takes this further, may it be that it only takes this sweet, delicate temperature from a nearby star, adding the life giving light, that supports a fair temperature on the surface of any planet, allowing the volcanos to erupt and lead to all the life possible on this actual planet, any planet again, whatsoever?

The onus is if it's possible for lava/magma to generate life in its basic form, shooting speed by nature's evolution. Is it?

The question is: why the h*ll should civilisation start on a meteor rather than from the magma/lava from underneath the planet's crust itself?

Is there indeed a capacity, inherently, for magma/lava to start life by simply ejecting some magma/lava onto the the planet's surface and then let the atmosphere, whatever this is, do the rest?

Is this the meeting point between physics, chemistry and biology? I think I'm affirmative on all these three!
I've been told there's a difficulty of separating the lowest forms of life versus f.x. mineral structures or mineral kinds of crystals, having a crystalline nature.

Anyone who may have some more information??? Isn't this peculiar? You know, who can we turn to? All the sciences are hiding something! They don't want to reveal their deficiencies in knowledge.

There is clearly a mystery here on the real status and capacity of the smallest parts of nature.

Possible experiment: lower a container that's impervious to the high temperatures of the magma/lava into the magma/lava and get a load of the magma/lava. Have a lid ready to be lowered on top the container, sealing it, relatively, and get the "stuff", magma/lava, poured into a nearby sterile chamber (through sterile pre-chambers) and then add sterile air and see if bacteria develops or if bacteria can be found whatsoever!
If it turns out magma/lava contains bacteria then the volcanos may be the answer to abiogenesis! I guess one can also experiment with types of gases, eg. methane, nitrogen-oxides, all sorts...

First written on the Philosophy Now forum by myself, 15.-16. October, 2010. From the original posts there, this has been edited to some extent.

By Terje Lea, 17.10.2010

back <-

Posted by L.F.O.-L. at 06:14:00
Labels: Opinions in Science, Philosophy of Science

21 comments:
O-L 12 October 2011 02:20
It seems Blogspot is juggling my posts to some degree, especially on "Opinions on Physics" where I've shown that Schrodinger is actually wrong with his Wave Collapse theory and that is should be up to the subject of _Psychology_ to investigate it further ((f)MRI and so on, mechanisms of telepathy and various)! I'm not responsible for this and it may/should also be Nobel Prize of Physics worthy what this particular writing represents!

O-L 12 October 2011 02:23
This post, below, of 26th August 2011, has been removed for some reason or another, but why? I don't know. However, I seem to recall that there was a posting on "Opinions in Physics". Now this seems to be gone! Well, well, "love", the primal one, labours on...

L.F.O.-L. 12 October 2011 07:44
For my writing on "Opinions on Physics", additional references are my "Time Theory" against McTaggart and "The Power of a Single Span of Time - an Instance - Contrary to Hume on Induction - The Refutation of the Problem of Induction". As you see from above you need to also consider the history of science in light of HDM and use a special consideration of Indirect Observation. To this, comes my reading of Smolin, Penrose (and various other) and my GCSE competence!

L.F.O.-L. 12 October 2011 11:35
Add. note: You also need to make a definite decision on being Realist (in Physics) concerning the use of mathematics and metaphysics (and so to avoid fx. Photo-Theory). This goes against fx. Field's Nominalism in mathematics. It also goes against the abuse of mathematics in physical terms, like that of Zeno's Paradox, never arriving in Sparta! Good?

L.F.O.-L. 14 October 2011 01:18
Monades has now been corrected to monads in this text as well. As I've written before, consistently "monads" throughout!

L.F.O.-L. 19 October 2011 22:34
Relating to the upcoming "destruction" of string theory that I've "declared war" against, I have picked up these words formerly posted on Facebook: I think I've gotten some laughs from this, "I'm going to put String Theory so firmly on a cloud (by power of description, -> plausibility) that not even the cloudheads, i.e., the string theorists, can get their heads to it...!!! :-)"
I've uttered a few others as well and I hope to greet my new country -men and -women with more in the time to come! Cheers!

L.F.O.-L.19 October 2011 23:07
This is my original note of putting the "Wave Collapse" to Psychology: "It's my recommendation today that the department of Physics, i.e., the subject of physics, transfers its crazy idea of wave collapse to the psychology department, i.e., the subject of psychology, where this can be investigated under telepathy and kaldraum-experiments (Kald Raum - german for Cold Room, i.e., no disturbances). Simply BECAUSE, "*pointing finger*", NO wave collapse can be measured (mental event) and in the cases where they claim it can, it's always 100%. So what's the point? To PSYCHOLOGY! :-)

L.F.O.-L. 19 October 2011 23:09
Some more under it: This is to be added to Opinions on Physics. The wave collapse can also be controlled by (f)MRI.
Besides, these wave collapse instances outside these mental events are governed by ordinary causality if not quantum mechanics.
These wave collapse instances _in physical terms_ under new and classic physics as _physical events_ ...!
"Governed by" -> "fall under" for the very demanding people out there. (Not that it was entirely stupid to write it otherwise.)
Besides, under my "Opinions on Physics" where I deal with wave collapse directly in preparation for attacking parts of the existing physics, you can still consider this wave collapse a "boomerang" move _STILL_ forming from the past and NOT some _empty_ future!

L.F.O.-L. 19 October 2011 23:10
NOT some _empty_ future!... excepting a boomerang event that is from the past to the future and back to the present from exactly this future that stems from the past (by "building" events, more or less steady)!

L.F.O.-L. 20 October 2011 14:21
When I address "On the Complexity of the Standard Model and Particles in Nature" I intend for it to hit physicists' claimed and absolute knowledge of the world in respect to their "definite and self-assured" stances on all matters pertaining to physics. This concerns mostly "monads"/"souls" and the physical explanation of telepathy. I HAVEN'T MEANT TO UNDERMINE ANY INVESTIGATION INTO A DEFINITIVE STANDARD MODEL OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. However, there has been a time when people have been so stubborn on the non-existence of these two entities, particularly the physicists and psychologists (rendering most of the world sceptical to telepathy and "souls"). I hold these people accountable for this and this accusation will remain as a feature, implicit or not, in every written history of science [unseriously, "of how stupid they have been"].
This pertains also to the "ability" of particles and how they work, their nature, and how we can make all come together in how we perceive the world. Why is it possible for telepathy to obtain in the way that it does? What is the nature of these particles (involved) that makes this possible?
This is the reason why this particular issue remains within the "evolution.html" page and part of the "Opinions on Physics"!

L.F.O.-L. 23 October 2011 23:40
These are the Blogspot data for some "confused" Blogspot management for some "accidentally" deleted that a poor administrator head could never see as "any" important (to me, at least, pathetically enough):
Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea at 06:36 0 comments
Labels: Copenhagen Interpretation, Graviton, Higg's Boson, Standard Model

With the date on top (for several) Friday, 26 August 2011!!! (I'm sorry for them and I apologise on their behalf! Americans good enough for themselves!) Cheers!

L.F.O.-L. 25 November 2011 14:48
To the above Kaldraum, you can add the former Ganzfeldraum!

L.F.O.-L. 3 December 2011 17:15
Just a slight little note on two scientific approaches:
1. Cancer approach: Two component view, by poison and counter-symptom medication! (I'm not an expert, I just speculate here!)
2. People may be happy regardless, either from own ideas or funny/"funny" thoughts, but happiness will never determine present psychopathy or schizophrenia! Perhaps this is obvious by now? Cheers!

L.F.O.-L. 3 December 2011 17:16
The cancer approach happens of course over the efficient rate, today this is measured in survival rate and possibly quality of life! (Note added!)

L.F.O.-L. 3 December 2011 20:40
The happiness stuff relates to Dr. Martin Seligmann. Additionally, the "thoughts" relate to reality or life itself, that life can be fun to _this_ person in this or that way, on the condition of this person's personality. If perversion is the fun for this person, _then_ (undeniably and by strict logical implication) this person laughs! There is no other way!

L.F.O.-L. 3 December 2011 20:41
Martin E. P. "Marty" Seligman (born August 12, 1942) is an American psychologist, educator, and author of self-help books. His theory of "learned helplessness" is widely respected among scientific psychologists.[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Seligman !

L.F.O.-L. 14 December 2011 15:46
Some data to consider: Posted to http://www.news4jax.com/news/-God-particle-coming-into-focus/-/475880/5346918/-/1js680z/-/index.html in relation to "Gravity" _forces_ are a whole different thing than energy by photons! Forces are given by a kind of smashing force, popularly speaking and this hinges on to the extent of this "Technicolour" set-up! You can't make "forces hop out the hat" like that! To look for forces is "to look for a car _in motion_"! (Or a photon in motion...) This "forces talk" is therefore doomed to fail as well!
'God particle' coming into focus
www.news4jax.com
Gossip isn't just for teenage girls -- scientists spread rumors, too. Physicists are giddy about an announcement that will come from the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) on Tuesday at 8 a.m. EST.
The forces issue in physics is really a meeting here of classical physics and these nuclear physics (all including string theory and quantum mechanics). All this has been under hard debate concerning the divide between classical physics and "new" physics and how to make it all come together!
Is it really necessary to have the Higgs-Boson to explain mass? Why can't ordinary particles have mass simply by property, that is, mass is part of their nature?
BBC World Have Your Say Here's a Q and A on the Higgs Boson: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/large-hadron-collider/8952584/Q-and-A-Higgs-boson.html
And isn't "Technicolour" a blow in the air?
Wasn't the intention in the first place (by 3,5 TeV/7 TeV) to smash these pieces smaller? So that the Protons would be split to smaller bits? Then CERN presents masses on 125 GeV? What?
The Up Quark has mass 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c(2) and 125 GeV(/c(2)) means something bigger than the Protons even, so you're considering "fusion effects" of the Protons to be the Higgs-Boson?
Q & A: Higgs boson - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk
Scientists have spent decades searching for signs of Higgs boson, the so-called
Some from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z_boson
W and Z bosons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The W and Z bosons (together known as the weak bosons) are the elementary partic...See more
GeV to MeV (or Giga to Mega): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giga
Giga- - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
Giga ( /ˈɡɪɡə/ or /ˈdʒɪɡə/) is a unit prefix in the metric system denoting a factor of billion (109 or 1000000000). It has the symbol G.
Fx. the Up quark: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_quark
Up quark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The up quark or u quark (from its symbol, u) is the lightest of all quarks, a ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton
Proton - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The proton is a subatomic particle with the symbol p or p+ and a positive ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_model
Standard Model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
The Standard Model of particle physics is a theory concerning the electromagneti...See more
To summarise the masses: Higgs Boson is suggested to 125 GeV(/c(2)), Proton 938.272046(21) MeV(/c2), W boson, 80.398±0.023 GeV/c2, Z boson, 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2 and (finally) the Up quark 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c2! Good?
It seems hard for Physorg to accept input to this story: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-12-particle-physicists-intriguing-hints-higgs.html !
Particle physicists report 'intriguing hints' of Higgs Boson
www.physorg.com
Yesterday physicists in Europe reported possible signs of the Higgs boson, a mis...See more
I note on Physorg.com that they are trying to "govern"/"steer"/hamper the scientific debate on Higgs' Boson by what I present here! Today, 15:08, 14.12.2011 CET.

L.F.O.-L. 14 December 2011 15:47
I also note a former story by Physorg.com: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-endgame-higgs-boson.html !

L.F.O.-L. 14 December 2011 15:49
Also a story by BBC on how the "God particle" may not exist: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1695390.stm !
BBC News | SCI/TECH | 'God particle may not exist'
news.bbc.co.uk
The most sought after particle in physics, the Higgs boson, may not even exist, suggest Geneva-based scientists.
Sorry also, but the story above by BBC is old, it appears: Thursday, 6 December, 2001, 13:13 GMT!
An example of Physorg idiocy: By "Despite the retarded wanton for moderation here, one link: http://whatiswritten777.blogspot.com/2011/10/opinions-on-science-in-expression-of.html and you need to locate "Opinions on Physics" (implying also the Photon Theory). I've written more on Higgs' later and I pursue the story of CNN and BBC by number on the masses by MeV and GeV in light of 3,5x2/7 TeV! Cheers!", I get "Your message didn't pass the spam-filter (even after log-in routines by Facebook) and your message will be manually moderated"! Ahhh, if they could only _manually_ look after _themselves_!!!

L.F.O.-L. 15 December 2011 23:26
Considering "Opinions on Physics" (if you bother to locate above, please), here is the status of today:
The Challenges to the Higgs' (All) - Killing it?
I just add the list, *The Kill List* for the Higgs':
Why the Higgs' field of the Universe when the Universe is (mostly?) "best" vacuum?!
How does Higgs' fit into the Unifying work of Physics?
Is it really necessary to have the Higgs-Boson to explain mass?
Why can't ordinary particles have mass simply by property, that is, mass is part of their nature?
Even then, why is it necessary for mass to "obtain" rather than to be as in "gravity", one form or another, i.e., explanation?
"Technicolour" isn't an alternative as it confuses "energy" and "forces"?
Wasn't the intention in the first place (by 3,5 TeV/7 TeV) to smash these pieces smaller? So that the Protons would be split to smaller bits? Then CERN presents masses on 125 GeV? What?
The Up Quark has mass 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c(2) and 125 GeV(/c(2)) means something bigger than the Protons even, so you're considering "fusion effects" of the Protons to be the Higgs-Boson?
Finally, the realism: To summarise the masses: Higgs Boson is suggested to 125 GeV(/c(2)), Proton 938.272046(21) MeV(/c2), W boson, 80.398±0.023 GeV/c2, Z boson, 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2 and (finally) the Up quark 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c2! Good? Merry Christmas!
Reaction, as in the military: Add the Photon Theory by asserting (plausibly) that "Photons are the smallest constituents of all matter. I assume the other particles of the Standard Model are made up of photons. Why is this? The sun burns mass and to my knowledge it only/mostly by far emits electromagnetic radiation, consequently in the form of photons. When a nuclear bomb explodes, it converts matter into electromagnetic radiation, energy of various forms. Compared to this, I think one can throw the string theory out the window along with dimensions beyond the usual 4 (I'm not certain about this concerning Einstein's theories that I'd like to keep as it is). Also, let's assume higher intensity radiation emits more dense amounts of photons and that it declines further down the electromagnetic spectrum.
(Extra: New on photons: I think I can also hold that photons are "semi-fluid" on a hyper-level (of course). I don't know what this adds to our view of reality, but it's a possible way of reconciling the wave-particle duality.)" On top of the Photon Theory: Unifying work -> full speed ahead!
You may want to check out Slashdot org under "LHC Homes In On Possible Higgs Boson Around 126GeV", message nr. 207, and The Kill List and the Photon Theory that's added there for all the virtues they can present... Enjoy! You know, the whole thing, the "split time-units after Big Bang", the "supersymmetry" on this basis, the "symmetry" and "symmetry break and the rest", it's... *for you to decide* (incl. other mysteries of this kind)! So therefore, at this point I don't go into that, but I admit that speculation is fun and it's going to be exciting to see how the map of science develops! Cheers!

L.F.O.-L. 15 December 2011 23:27
Due to the evolving comprehension of "Opinions on Physics", I've now re-published it as a new post here on this blog, going parallel with the Science blog!