Relating to Theories of the Universe and All the "Grand Ideas"

Relating to an article on books in a paper that I've bought, "and Swedish is hard to read, even in Helsinki".

One can ask, why is it necessary to assert that energy out of a black hole is anything more than energy? (FYI, there is indeed a beam of something coming out of black holes!) As from any star, you may be able to analyse chemical properties of this star by considering the light emitted out of chemical signatures for the relevant element (from the Table of Elements, mostly, /perhaps/). Further, why bother to assert more than what already is in the Universe as the Universe expands (rapidly, by quasars and all else, probably at the speed of light) that there is a parallel Universe when there's _not_ the faintest "parallelity" anywhere else to point to?

As with the romance of baby-black-holes (that has bust) I think we need to acknowledge that being human is to be small against nature and its Universe!
To understand one's humanity is to understand that one shouldn't hold views that one can't ground properly out of being a mere dot on a huge planet in a _far_ more HUGE Universe!

Thank you for your attention if you bother to read me!

A Speculative Theory on USA - A Biggest Dog Theory

The theory is that USA is hostile _unless_ they can make money on their relations abroad! You check this out, please!

Note: I know of their many well-meaning charities, but it seems to me that they take it back it damage and corruption!
Note2: this is not entirely serious as such because they are probably a lot of good people too and "the network is just smeared all over the same archetypes of humanity, perhaps"!!!

Flash Ascents and Flash Descents in Stock Markets

Sensitive stock-brokers make the flash rises and flash declines is my theory! If they sit there and are incredibly alert to everything with their companies/portfolio, they may act a bit hot-headed and this _can_ cause these flash changes, I think!
In addition, due to an increasing use of programmed "robots", these robots can aggregate with these effects as we see!

This is a comment over the recent months of these flash changes with the NYSE/Dow Jones Stock Market of New York. You can add some other, but to add NASDAQ in this manner may be considered strange for a number of reasons, part. the data-set, that the behaviour displayed by NYSE isn't seen so readily with the NASDAQ.

Japan and "the Currency Value is Too High (eeek)"!!!

There is a simple solution for Japanese fears/"fears" for own height/increased currency of value because the true concern lies in the opposite, a very _low_ currency value, something you only find in deeply dysfunctional economies.
So either the Japanese are crying/moaning for nothing over a "game" of politeness or they are entering a kind of self-imposed/self-inflicted "injury"/"damage"/"hardship"!

Note: no offense to Japan as such and thanks for driving China/Asia!

The Athletics Version over the ETI of Mine

The Original text of ETI is as follows:
The Encumbrance Theory of Intelligence (ETI) - Philosophy of Psychology?
Posted 07/23/09 - 10:13 PM; forums.philosophyforums.com

I'm not against operationalism of intelligence expressed as I.Q. I think it can be very useful and I also like the fact that the systems are continually reviewed and improved.

This theory assumes that the mind continuously considers objects of interest, both necessary and optional. When one puts the mind to something this process runs until the mind deems it finished, temporarily or finally.

The ETI is the notion that people who are caught in struggles in life scores lower on I.Q.-tests than their non-trifled counterparts. The premise is that those who are caught in difficult struggles have to devote resources of their consciousness to the problem so when these are tested, their mind is simultaneously considering other issues as well on some level. In a sense they are not truly free, enjoying freedom.

Unencumbered people are free to be as aggressive on intellectual challenges as much as their hearts can pump blood through the brain. They have no serious worries occupying their minds.

Besides, in this, I assume that people are made up of "souls" and are initially equally perfect. It's the environment that hooks up their processes of consc. to the level of their current picture of intelligence, say I.Q. That is, reality is detriment to the ideal, "soul" condition. Obviously, I don't argue from the premise of souls which I find rather distasteful at the present moment. Nurture can do a lot to people, I find. I say this so that you may get a clue from where I'm coming from. In a sense, people are perfect as reactions from the factors of life. Edit: "That is, reality is detriment to the ideal, "soul" condition." Don't get me wrong! It's apparent that you build your intelligence through the course of life and that death, of what we know for sure, extinguishes both life and intelligence.

Alright! This is the start. There will be more.

I look forward to your opinions! Feel free to throw in what you think is appropriate! There is a book on the other side of "The Bell Curve" that I'm looking for, but it's not "The Bell Curve Discussion". Any suggestions?
Posted 07/24/09 - 04:17 PM; forums.philosophyforums.com

I agree that my theory doesn't account for physical (genetic) defects or brain diseases. It's the case that I don't intend to make it that way. I can however interpret you to mean also the physical structure that is supposed to make the impression of qualia or whatever and in this respect also, my theory is flat. I hold that if the brain is relatively healthy, my theory says something despite relatively small differences. Two people who score 170 in IQ are analogous to two people who bench 150 kg. I see no important differences between those two sets. I agree that intelligence is a complex issue (therefore operationalism), but I also have the impression that smart people in science are quite open to talk about intelligence and what makes them good. Access to data is plentiful in other words.

For the athletics part, one now adds, in addition to good physical stats like height in basketball and other and the actual exercise in the athletics of one's choice, one needs to care for the stress parts from a suitable age, 14 perhaps and all the way up to elite performer, whether ice-hockey or something else!

It's important to remember ALL the stress that affects your performance and drop the (false) super(wo)man-psychology in order to identify the negative stress factors that may get in your way altogether.

Then is my suggestion for the bottom issues in athletics performances as well! Cheers!

Note: this was first published to the Whatiswritten777 blog!

Further on Telepathy -> Ganzfeldraum and all the rest...

On telepathy: If telepathy, whatever way you see it, provides nothing, 0 results, _then_ you're justified in NOT believing in it, but if it gives you 10/100 then these 10 results may be worth something very special, on skill, almost the same as when jet-fighter pilots begin using their eyes on the sky and get better in it! Not only this, but what fantastic nature doesn't these 10 results hold? I'm telling you, START believing!!!

The Explicit Consequence of Crime vs. Privacy

This relates to the Science of Jurisdiction/Law and Philosophy of Law.
As soon as the letter of the Laws is broken, the rights for absolute privacy fall away by definition and the perpetrator(s) fall(s) into the category of possible persecution (by law enforcement, first and foremost)! Note: However, as a crime (letter of the Laws...) has taken place, everyone has either the duty or possibility to file a report to the Police about their "suspicions"/sightings/what they've witnessed!

Note: I'm inspired by Nancy Grace and we may share some "context" here.