The Two Collected Writings on the Free Will Theorem

1. The Free Will Theorem and Quants - Complexity
Various!Posted by Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2011-07-05 03:30:40

I think it requires complexity of heavier bodies of matter for free will to obtain.
The Free Will Theorem is presented by John Conway and Simon Kochen and the Wikipedia page has a criticism of them as a part of presenting The Free Will Theorem.
The url to it is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will_theorem.

Fx. a stream of photons of visible light can only do that much when speeding away from the Sun. There is no evidence that the stream of photons can change anything in particular, let's say direction, compensating for some gravity. See Einstein's relativity for gravity effects on photons.

Also, complexity should also be required for the decision for choosing between pleasure and relaxation and exercise and feeding and hunt. Although, these properties are only present with animals and ourselves, the humans.

So unless a bigger body is chosen and the choices are somehow explicated, I think "undetermined" is too weak for giving any plausibility to it or credibility for that matter.

I think, though, that the Dr. Dick Bierman experiments of Holland show that "monades" are likely to obtain in a fundamental way, in line with The Free Will Theorem by John Conway and Simon Kochen, rather than an unknown mechanism that may be impossible to find. This is a warning to future experimenters (the physicists).

The conclusion must be that a bigger system is effectuating the free will existing everywhere whether you call it God or some strange uknown super entity of the Universe / Multiverse or whatever.

Note: originally posted as http://blog.t-lea.net/#post232
Note2: you can also read about this on Static Display... on Facebook, it's an open group of mine.
Note3: To Blogspot, by Whatiswritten777 Friday, 26 August 2011, by 2011/08/26, 03:22:00 PM!

2. Concerning The Free Will Hypothesis of Math - Suggested Modification
This will be the Modified Hypothesis of Free Will by quantum experiment maths. Applied Mathematics!
Allegedly then, by this, Free Will is obtained by merely _neutral_ and positive values of tested particles.
That is, you simply _deselect_ some options like an extremely (medically aided) long life, by one argument for Free Will!
This is inline with both my own Free Will arguments and with the two mathematicians of Princeton! Good for them and cheers to you!

The free will theorem of John H. Conway and Simon B. Kochen states that, if we have a certain amount of "free will", then, subject to certain assumptions, so must some elementary particles. Conway and Kochen's paper was published in Foundations of Physics in 2006.[1] - My respects to them _by name_!
Secondly, people are deeply _wrong_ if they think that I don't understand that The Free Will Theorem is about the free will of particles, I _merely_ dispute the degree "their", the particles Free Will is _*significant*_!!! I also wonder what kind of Free Will would be displayed if these particles roam toward the edges of space/universe! To my knowledge, Free Will arises as matter of life on planets and that, of course, Free Will _takes hold_, is made possible by this _only_! But in the end, I don't need to question the status of Free Will in these particles. I only need to point toward the consequences of larger facts (by ..._deselect_...) of life and _downward_ to these particles, regardless of what Free Will lies there! If I'm pushed on this matter, I simply fall because I believe in "monads" too! Cheers! (This has been posted to the Facebook group "The Free Will Theorem"
To Blogspot, Whatiswritten777, by 8 November 2011 04:26 AM CET.

Further notice on Free Will and Determinism as Metaphysical Entities:
On the Free Will Theorem, and Free Will, all in all, thoroughly proven, it's important to remember that Free Will lies *UNDER* science and NOT above it. Free Will or Determinism has absolutely no implication for science and the laws are of course held under the concept of "laws", because they are expected to never break!

As laws of nature or principles, as correct description, of nature! (This is entered here as well! I think about entering it also to the primary Free Will Theorem where I've added the _neutral_ state to the Theorem of Conway's, thus remaking their Theorem to a new Theorem! This has first been added to Facebook moments ago!)
By Blogspot, Whatiswritten777, by 18 December 2011 05:18 AM!
This looks rather bad right now and I'll straighten out this mess sometime soon!