Some Fish-Study Prediction Has Been Made - Here's what... (By IOP presentation...)

Victory is declared over the fish-"psychologists" for making a simplified voters' model.

(By suspicion,) I also, by this, have beaten (parts of) Top Gear, swathes of Germany (because the team has had at least one German with them) and David Letterman.

Bow!!! Hey!!! Beer for us on the other side!

(As before, also the holder of mSomatism. This is also, the election-outcome, in line with much of the serious literature on voters' behaviour from the establishment of the political sciences!)

The Psychologists' Insistence on Social Scheming and Murder (of Old)!

One voice says, telepathic or not, to its followers, that former pres. "de Gaulle" [a name relevant to France in this matter] is to die inside the next 10 years. The psychologists follow up with the usual "gaming" of carnivore nature, vowing and displaying "much feelings", drama! Then the former pres. of France actually dies within the next 10 years, but nobody can say whether it has occured naturally or whether it has been a murder, the circumstances are indeed obscured. Not only this, but some time after, another "head in the clouds" take on the blame for what he says is murder and that he now holds this great man's murder in his soul, that he is THIS BIG! Now what does this mean, that if I say it's my nature to kill people and to present myself as an insult to the public at the same time, what is the significance of this? And as this must be said to be self-confirming prophesis, then what? Aren't they insults all in all if they are to say this in FULL seriousness, in full academic honesty? What if one is managing to present another case "on the other side", that people are by and large law-abiding, what is the meaning of this to the above? And finally, why do we then have something that we call "the legal system" and consider this to be a brand-mark of civilisation, the meter we measure civilisation by? So I just keep questioning these "carnivore-notions of old fashioned psychology"! Let's see where this goes! Cheers! PS: Unnecessary to say perhaps that this places it with the demanded, of mine at least, Quality Revision of Psychology incl. the Erich Fromm dispositions and fascinations with diseases and the Scientism-Scientists debate against Resp.towardMysteries-Scientists, ethics in hand, soundly! PS2: You may add some hidden assumptions by the police, the tacit "hate-management" assumptions of the old tradition, the "material" presented and the mSomatism of mine, relating to the cognition of right from wrong in describing Schizophrenia, a not-yet-dead-concept, to say it mildly!

In Organising the (Public) Health Sector - Advise to the Health Minister of Norway

My only advise to Gahr Støre/Store these days in organising an effective (public) health sector for his nation, is a simple one: get the system engineers and quality engineers moving (while also caring for a patient-friendly "interface"/welcoming approach! The rest is taken care of by consensus medicine and I don't know much of medicine that's now, you know, pretty well taken care of ("outside the classics like all cancers", but only in this quote-marked sense, the palliative side should now be most excellent).