Another Objection to Psychology and One Notion of Idiocy

Under social psychology:
Note on "Equals" and "Pecking Order"
I advise people to only accept to be "equal" among friends and the "pecking order" in the hierarchical sense, by organisations, from the state leader to common bureaucrats, from the CEO to the programmer/IT administrators. Even then, the pecking order really only denotes how disciplinary reactions are to flow downward from the Company Board down to the common worker! Please, take note of this and life shines so much brighter!
Pecking order doesn't go along with insanity. And here's why:
You can't be expected to obey a pecking order when there's insanity involved because that's just insane, i.e., there's no use in engaging with insane requirements.
The insane is, of course, placed outside rationality as before, and this in every way!
This is an objection further to these psychologists (some of whom "are hungry for something or not"!).

Here we go again:
Democratic principles...
Objective ethics...
Human being to human being
and then, insofar as peaceful circumstances are possible to obtain, activity is ON, possible to share under these /exact/ requirements, given by this list I write to you now.

Whether you call the people you share the activity with "peers" or not, I don't care!!!

Clearly...

(And USA needs to stop insisting on insane "might is right", i.e., by their Military Complex and other!!!)

Over IQ Testing, The Bell Curve and the Future

I have updated the message to you so that it now looks like this: For political reasons and having entered the US registry first(?), I bring some point of view if you want it:
It should now be noted that the question of intelligence has remained largely/wholly undecided over whether IQ could be connected with humanistic values or not! Now that I've written about insanity and other and achieved reputation more, also for other efforts, I, for one, call for decision IN FAVOUR PRO-humanistic values in connection with the IQ scale that better reflect the actual performance of intelligence with the intellectuals of the World, scientists, engineers, and writers alike, all included!

My latest before the above, "having been involved since the 80s": In responding to these new "contextual-intelligence" idiots, I just want to say right away that I support the testing standards of intelligence (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Raven's Progressive Matrices, predominantly, also by the usual Mensa notions or conventions) and not these "contextual-intelligence" idiots. That to refer to contextual intelligence is to me a way to disguise a kind of stupidity, and the "contextual-intelligence" stories are all too easy to mock, as much as the story goes with "Magic-Moment-at-Drinking-Beer-at-the-Local-Pub" in saving the World from nuclear holocaust and acquiring this utmost /highest/ "contextual-intelligence" because at this special moment, and having trained for beer-drinking a very long time, and seeing this moment coming too, Beer-Drinking Jack from the local factory scores the "ultimate point" again!!!
Be this the "John G." spot of Jochum's Pub in Fars(-e)und "kommune" or not!!! I also happen to support the notion that intelligence testing is to happen neutrally, in the absolute sense, and that intelligence is NOT a social phenomenon, but a measure to rate the functioning of a (healthy) brain in order to predict who is the most successful, and that, even by the psychologists, that the scale is meant to, as Adjustment-updated, reflect the direct performance in science and ALL f*cking else!

(Not because you ask for permission for taking a test, under the torture -clinic, being socially "allowed" to score this or that! Also, by tech-eyes, that are invalidating, not because of the victim, but because of this implant-administering retard who has rejected ethics and Helsinki-declaration altogether and "plays" this very important GAM(I)E!!!)

Also, I find this insistence on the Bell's Curve insulting because it has roots in a (racist-)USA (to Palestinians or poor Africans, because USA is so intelligent is actually scores so high that it moves the "quota" from Africa to its(god-d*mn)self! I also hold it to the Bell Curve people themselves in that they are academically demanded to say "peaceful circumstances for testing or be thrown out of the good society!!! "Also scoring 151/200 _not_ under the torture clinic!"

So a new approach to testing on a more *precise* and *real* basis /can/ be this: 1. The test as before. 2. An additional test array involving a kind of strongly limited personality testing, determining a kind of self-confidence 3. The testing management (as people, three perhaps) then gives an additional "aesthetic" value for "police code as requirement of corrupt personality"/"monkey-business" Final: These 3 steps may be/should be necessary in order to spark a new debate over future progress of human kind and that subversion against this kind of (voluntary) research falls (strictly) outside academic standards. Personality is investigated in line with Jungian traditions. I think there's also good reason to say that US intelligence by fx. CIA and McCarthyism may have been more interested in the personality issues than hitherto known! A slight point on the pre-WW2 suspicions as history writing.

[For the "worried": THIS IS ABOUT THE VERY RESEARCH. NOT THE CINEMA NEAR YOU.]

The "...additional "aesthetic" value..." may be considered set as a kind of "clairvoyance/"seeing the band-track" or other (see Bem of the Cornell University).

Over "The Horn Antenna Ver. 2.0" for WMAP-Map and The Speed of the Magnetic Field

The Idea of "The Horn-Antenna Ver. 2.0":
It's my suggestion that a new "horn-antenna" is set up as a digital pick-up without the "horn"-antenna shape, and that this gets programmed to open and close parts of the pick-up of WMAP signals so that a consistent pattern can be presented digitally. That is, it's my suspicion that the horn-shape distorts the WMAP of the Universe somewhat and that I think this needs to be investigated the way I describe here, as new set-up. It should be noted that the shape of the "horn-antenna" also precedes the essential part of the computer age.
I therefore write this to you now so that new designs can be worked out and a new "Horn Antenna Ver. 2.0" can be set up. I also happen to know about the new WMAP satelite that investigates possible differences between Earth data and (outer-)space data. Still, though, I think this new design should be necessary, even if it may cost a bit of money.
Design therefore, reiterated: a new pick-up antenna, in the electro-magnetic spectrum of the old horn-antenna, but set up digitally, without the horn-shape so that data gets collected in a different way and that one works the collected signals intensely and accurately so that a spherical (any approximation accepted) or other shapes accepted as well, just that the data enters the presentation correctly.

Comment on "the Speed of Magnetic Field":
The theoretical impossibility for Graviton by my writing makes "the speed of the gravity field as matter of magnetism" instant, necessarily.
But the thing is, there may be two kinds of magnetic fields. One that's induced by electromagnetic forces and one that's the property of matter itself. This former may have the speed of light and the other is, as above, instant.
However, the electro-magnetically induced field by electro-magnetic generator may also have the nature of "ball-on-ball-principle" and thus be instant too. This is yet to be determined, to my knowledge, at least!
(I just mention the book of Stathis Psillos that's named "Causation and Explanation" (2002), not that I bother to cite the very page or anything right now, only to say that "I know about it".)

(Remark over the tech-eyes as criminal relation and violation of my privacy: this work has been completed 15:06 CET on 2013-01-31 before being published first on Facebook several hours later.)