Note on "Equals" and "Pecking Order"
I advise people to only accept to be "equal" among friends and the "pecking order" in the hierarchical sense, by organisations, from the state leader to common bureaucrats, from the CEO to the programmer/IT administrators. Even then, the pecking order really only denotes how disciplinary reactions are to flow downward from the Company Board down to the common worker! Please, take note of this and life shines so much brighter!
Pecking order doesn't go along with insanity. And here's why:
You can't be expected to obey a pecking order when there's insanity involved because that's just insane, i.e., there's no use in engaging with insane requirements.
The insane is, of course, placed outside rationality as before, and this in every way!
This is an objection further to these psychologists (some of whom "are hungry for something or not"!).
Here we go again:
Democratic principles...
Objective ethics...
Human being to human being
Clearly...
(And USA needs to stop insisting on insane "might is right", i.e., by their Military Complex and other!!!)
The descriptive side is something else. The above is along the normative psychology and with its professional ethics.
ReplyDeleteI write "objection to psychology", but its intended to read "objection to one notion (in) psychology", not that I would ever in the World object to psychology, the academic subject overall!
ReplyDeleteThere is also a second charge of the most corrupt kind against "pecking order" and it is that it's much easier to promote corrupt minds among the (selected) group because they are always dynamic to one another, always attacking and defending on the basis that "pecking order" describes an animalistic behaviour, the fact that birds kill...
ReplyDeleteIt's also Blogger services that force through lower case "un" rather than UN in capital letters. Just so you know.
ReplyDeleteUN has been mentioned because of the suspected "forced" group dynamics on the UN General Assembly there, and with other people who live in New York and work for the United Nations.