This relates to the Science of Jurisdiction/Law and Philosophy of Law.
As soon as the letter of the Laws is broken, the rights for absolute privacy fall away by definition and the perpetrator(s) fall(s) into the category of possible persecution (by law enforcement, first and foremost)! Note: However, as a crime (letter of the Laws...) has taken place, everyone has either the duty or possibility to file a report to the Police about their "suspicions"/sightings/what they've witnessed!
Note: I'm inspired by Nancy Grace and we may share some "context" here.
I am to post this to whatiswritten777 as well under Philosophy of Law under, again, the 100% Society!
ReplyDeleteRemember still, though, that Law Enforecement HAS to obtain evidence in a legal manner, that is, after reports have been filed... or after a sting operation we managed to... You know where this is going! Cheers!
ReplyDeleteJudges, especially of the lower courts may be doing mistakes too. Therefore, the trust put in them by their colleagues higher up may be deeply misplaced. As the judges of the lower courts are seen as more or less error-free, expecting the system to accommodate for mistakes, that is, to correct them (by the appeal system), the whole system gets corrupted. This may be the cumulative effects we live with today! Not only the courts are a problem, but the Police, special interests Laws by lobbying groups, by companies or else and so on! This makes it definite that there is room for a lot of improvement, by system and so on.
ReplyDelete