Criticism of Today's Tectonic Theory and the Launching of a New Investigation Angle
Today's issue: Tectonic theory, the theory that deals with the Earth's crust, it's "moving plates". I'm sceptical toward the version of tectonic plates that says that mountains extend all the way down to the lava/magma under the crust of the Earth.
While this may be true in some cases, I think most of the time, one finds "sediment layers", very compact at that that can negotiate the roundness of the Earth much better than the harder materials can justify. Thus, the plates are more like the semi-firm/hard "dough" (of peppercake kind) than the rock-hard impression most people have.
But this is of the enormous scale such that our impression of standing on rock-hard ground stays with us. These are just thoughts and I'm not well-read on this matter.
But what this does, is to corroborate or pave the way for how hydrocarbons (fossil fuels, pop. speaking) can be found even under the mountains and that hydrocarbons in this way are _not_ "dead plants, dead dinosaurs" and so on, but are created in a different way, out of the "bio-nuclear" reactor core of Earth.
This way of creating new matter, you know, from the very formation of the Earth may have entirely different origins for coming into being than what is hithertho known/understood/thought of. Your thoughts, please. (It is now made a proper note/document/communiqué.)
In asserting hope for people in terms of water and fuel: Water, estimated findings 0 - 1 km below Earth's surface, Oil/Gas, estimated findings 1 - 15 km below Earth's surface. Agree? :-D (This is without any particular knowledge, but I know of Deep Sea drilling (Mexican Gulf catastrophy) and general water basin consideration, something I find to be function of surrounding sea levels and other, rain etc. You can consider Japan vs. China/Inner China, fx.)
A more serious formulation:
I've now come to name this: new Crust Formation Theory.
It says that, given a certain body of Earth Crust, there is a (steady probability) proportional, "equal" chance to that of fx. USA to actually find oil and gas there, *where-ever* you search!
That everywhere on the planet, given this basic unit of Earth Crust there is a certain precentage chance to identify oil and gas, if not the minerals as well.
What's been stopping us? I believe, the politics, the lies and craving for financial power, the greed, from the "first" powers and the people with them (the powers as nations), like that of Old and Decadent Europe, that of Nazi-Sponsoring USA.
So now what? Yes, on a broader level, big units of political power need to establish "best standards" oil and gas institutes with the heart of the exploration, the resources identifying geological unit very central, to establish the IIT equiv. of oil and gas geology here and there in the World, going head on against companies like Halliburton and Baker-Hughes!
This is my advise and you're now responsible for carrying it through! Go, go, go!
Note: This has originally been posted to Static Display... on Facebook, 17. August 2011 by time 05:58 and 06:39.
Note2: The original note on Facebook, "This is written to the Facebook group, Static Display of Work... today, 17.08.2011, at appx. 05:58 and some 20 minutes backward from this point in time."
Note3: A more serious formulation has been entered today, 2012-12-09.
As an update for my tectonics theory, you can add the usual search methods: all photon spectrum methods for detection/location of earthly resources, oil, gas, various minerals of mining. These photon ranges include all the gamma rays, the high intensity spectrum of the electro-magnetic spectrum! In addition comes the use of sound waves. All these are angled toward the bottom and range of investigation and reflected upward again (as substance signature, i.e., sea, mud, sediments and so on) toward the detector ship, with its fleet of detectors tugged behind it! The it comes to the drilling for confirmation/verification! There is no doubt that the US Americans have been fooling us, the rest of the World! Good luck, people!
First posted to Facebook moments ago!
For the blogs, this have lurked about on the Whatiswritten777 blog for a while now!
ReplyDeleteFrom Wikipedia and under my own Tectonics theory: The oceanic crust of the sheet is different from its continental crust. The oceanic crust is 5 km (3 mi) to 10 km (6 mi) thick[1] and is composed primarily of basalt, diabase, and gabbro. The continental crust is typically from 30 km (20 mi) to 50 km (30 mi) thick and is mostly composed of slightly less dense rocks than those of the oceanic crust. Some of these less dense rocks, such as granite, are common in the continental crust but rare to absent in the oceanic crust. Both the continental and oceanic crust "float" on the mantle. Because the continental crust is thicker, it extends both above and below the oceanic crust. The slightly lighter density of felsic continental rock compared to basaltic ocean rock
ReplyDeletecontributes to the higher relative elevation of the top of the continental crust. Because the top of the continental crust is above that of the oceanic, water runs off the continents and collects above the oceanic crust. The continental crust and the
oceanic crust are sometimes called sial and sima respectively. Because of the change in velocity of seismic waves it is believed that on continents at a certain depth sial becomes close in its physical properties to sima, and the dividing line is called
the Conrad discontinuity.
Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crust_(geology)
Crust (geology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In geology, the crust is the outermost solid shell of a rocky planet or natural ..."
Distinctly from and not relevant: Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(geology)
Mantle (geology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The mantle is a part of a terrestrial planet or other rocky body large enough to..."
Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth%27s_crust
Abundance of elements in Earth's crust - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "The table shows the abundance of elements in Earth's crust. Numbers show percentage or parts per million (ppm) in mass; 10,000 ppm = 1%..."
I have doubts whether it is true as Wikipedia writes that the sea floor is so distinct from the ordinary crust under the surface we walk on, the surface of the Earth because at times the ocean floor only extends 200m down, fx. the North Sea basin that also is home to platforms set onto the ocean floor /directly/! This is a note!
You can also write North Sea shelf!
I've now come to name this: new Crust Formation Theory.
ReplyDeleteIt says that, given a certain body of Earth Crust, there is a (steady probability) proportional, "equal" chance to that of fx. USA to actually find oil and gas there, *where-ever* you search!
That everywhere on the planet, given this basic unit of Earth Crust there is a certain precentage chance to identify oil and gas, if not the minerals as well.
What's been stopping us? I believe, the politics, the lies and craving for financial power, the greed, from the "first" powers and the people with them (the powers as nations), like that of Old and Decadent Europe, that of Nazi-Sponsoring USA.
So now what? Yes, on a broader level, big units of political power need to establish "best standards" oil and gas institutes with the heart of the exploration, the resources identifying geological unit very central, to establish the IIT equiv. of oil and gas geology here and there in the World, going head on against companies like Halliburton and Baker-Hughes!
This is my advise and you're now responsible for carrying it through! Go, go, go!
Best Christmas-wishes,
L. F. Olsnes-Lea
For the stock markets, the Brent Blend and New York WTI, a state of affairs, report: After (my) Crust Formation Theory, by current name, and formerly "Criticism of Today's Tectonics", there's NO doubt that oil and gas are now priced according to industry agreement, i.e., socially, over the intensity of oil and gas exploration, i.e., identifying new oil and gas reserves. The 2. part of the price setting is now (and all the way to 2500 CE(?)) purely by OPEC and aesthetics, a kind of "Feng Shui" of oil and gas price setting.
ReplyDeleteAs with the "2500 CE" above scarcity isn't expected any time before, by my prediction, 2500 CE, at least, really having no clue of this and that, including future World population and the average reserve of oil and gas per standard unit of explorable Earth crust. Enjoy yourselves!
Extra note on Halliburton and Baker-Hughes, for "Microsoft"-market positions, also under US (American) sweeping of plutonium and other exploration-related (technical) materials.
ReplyDeleteTo the notions of "Fracking", I think fracking is to remain minor comparing to injection techniques (by fx. ConocoPhillips) and that exploiting other unidentified resources will be the main avenue toward extraction of oil and gas (by Crust Formation Theory) outside existing oil- and gas production (-fields/-reservoirs)!!!
ReplyDeleteTo me, by http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/Nye-energiveier-i-verden-7080352.html, fracking remains too costly and a hype (for now) and has little cost-effective potential! Happy new year!
Url to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fracking .
Hydraulic fracturing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
First to Facebook a few moments ago.
Some message, it does look "ugly", outside CSM academia conv.:
ReplyDeleteNote6: 1. From my YouTube video, as quick geological surveys by plane, "plutonium based, indústry-grade [enrichment]", When I say plutonium-based, I do not say that this is a /definite/ demand, as I have read little of the literature for this, and there is no problem for me to say that "use very-god-d*mn-thing", all to a type of radio-frequency-generator because these generators can generate every frequency there is, I think, not even necessarily inside the "radio-frequencies". No, the target for this is USA (again) and Baker-Hughes and Halliburton! 2. for 1 uge siden I'm supposed to add the tag, mSomatism, for some people and I'm pleased to do this now. 3. for 1 uge sidenTags should be: science, philosophy, modal logics, logics, NDNID, new crust formation theory, Mr. Oil and Gas, Lenny F. Olsnes-Lea, Olsnes-Lea, Photon Theory,Schrödinger's Cat, Schrödinger's Rat, Opinions on Physics.