Psychiatry and the Modified Somatist Position

This whole (web-)page of my writings belongs to my person, i.e., © Terje Lea / Terje L. F. Olsnes-Lea / Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea 2005 - 2011. Make no mistake about it!

Update: 04.07.2011. Written by Terje Lea / Terje L. F. Olsnes-Lea / Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea. 20.12.2005(?)-2011.

Psychiatric Views and Findings

Seriously,

Somatist: I regard the somatist psyciatry in combination with telepathy and telepathic effects, the only possible psychiatric position one can have for real.

Concerning telepathy, just laugh, ignorance has never solved anything, but if you're curious and mindful enough, you should know that experiments on telepathy have shown statistical significance and that in one experiment, perhaps in Scotland, two American couples have gotten 100% scores, perfect scores! I'd say a way to telepathy is hypersensitivity and the way to enhance those feelings is to be conscious about them. Not only that, but to make the necessary connection that if it's done correctly, puts you into the telepathic domain, is to analyse the feelings you have by lying on a bench, not being occupied with anything. Some of those feelings are clearly due to you lying on a bench, a comfortable place, preferably, but others are sensations coming from somewhere else, most likely people who are inclined, as the Moon's inclination to the Earth is a natural relationship, to engage with you emotionally or intellectually. There are, beside the telepathy of feelings, also visual, auditory and the combination of all three telepathy. The impressions vary from what you make in your own mind to more reasonable results of various. Telepathy can be very inexact and it can be troubling to discern it all. With telepathy, you may want to investigate "quantum entanglement", "contextualism" and "chaos theory". All of this is just assertions based on personal experience, but I've written it so now you can find out yourselves. Godspeed!

Additional message to Europe (and to the sceptics): Now, do you think they had a boatload of Americans to test? NO, God dammit! I think, by admission, the Americans, 4 of them, landed on the bank of Europe, Scotland, Edinburgh or Glasgow, and made their point! And what a Hell of a point! Are we in Europe dumb or something? I say no more!!!

Additional note: you may want to take notice of the word "truthiness" that has been named the word of the year in USA, 2004(?). I believe this word derives from a certain special relationship akin to a telepathic mechanism, either in relation to other people or aspects from nature itself in the instance of fx. quantum entanglement.

Efficiency in the private sector is known to be far better both in terms of quality (outcome of every consult) and on quantity (they treat more people per day and also perhaps, spend less time on the perverse).

Mental disorders:

The separation of issue. Example: I give here 2 examples of disadvantages, 1 disease and 1 genetic disorder. The first is Syphilis. It is caused by bacteria. The next is Down's Syndrome which is given pre-birth and represented by genetic disorder. These 2 examples are chosen because they were commonly known to be psychiatric illnesses in the past while they are NOT. They cause typical mental characteristics that differ from those found in normal people.

Then we find the proper categories:

Depression. Every depression is the result of a threat to the bond, your body and health. This has been said by an experienced psychologist/psychiatrist. If you suffer a loss of a person, you usually become sad, but in this sense, if the person has been critical to your physical security, you may enter depression. Depression is not a joke! Recently, it has been announced through media that depression may cause suicide at every severity. I have the sense that people who suffer depression are being held to the flames through some informal mechanism of society. It's assumed that this mechanism can be destroyed. I must also say that I see opportunities for Utopia in the future. I like to add this. It's better to die as a person, morality intact, than none at all. Keep yourself alert and have that focus on physical security!

Manic-depressive, bipolar.

Schizophrenia. Rebound of attitudes that the soul cannot carry without creating a personality fracture on the terms of moral in the type of experience. So all of these cases in this view have something to do with an outlook that breaches the natural moral of the inner mental life. When these breaches occur, the soul is suppressed by own negative view and replaced with externally founded personality from single or multiple people. Schizophrenia, I believe, is irreversible. If you go down that road, there's no turning back! I think it can be slowed down to some degree by alcohol or drugs, medicine and thereby be given a better functioning to the social connections, suppressing these tendencies of stupid, bizarre, deviant thoughts. More information on Schizophrenia here. I hope you can make good use of it.

Paranoia. The thought of being persecuted/stalked without being so. I believe, honestly, that few paranoid people haven't experienced something criminal either as a victim or as an offender. The following mistaken view is one of natural consequence, but not one for real. One is about to loose control because of stress due to spin of thoughts.

Dissociative Identity Disorder. I'd say there's no doubt that suffering from DID puts one on the ladder of Schizophrenia, but the person is at the lowest level and there should be good possibility of reversing the condition. The person, presumably, has been living under conditions that have been life threatening, but in a special kind of way, in that the person has been forced to accept deep immorality in order to survive and therefore the condition arises. What then? I suggest that as quickly as the situation is normal, safe, stable again and the specific threat to one's life is removed "forever", one should begin to perceive a healthy personal ethics that guide this person through the rest of the good life and this has to be exercised discipline, otherwise one climbs the ladder of Schizophrenia, I think. Typically, maybe, there's this stem of some assumed 3 identities, personalities and that depending on what forces and social anticipations that play on person XYZ, XYZ having 3 identities, personalities, XYZ plays out the relevant personality. For actual survival?
I can imagine that the personality that can be developed in "normal/ideal" circumstances is the "main" personality of the person, "inner" person. I'm not a skeptic in getting to know people, quite the other way around, but it's busy these days, you're supposed to work hard and earn money and so on.

Eating disorders, Anorexia/Bulimia. The two eating disorders, I think, can be separated into the two large groups of Depression/Schizophrenia with Anorexia belonging in Depression and Bulimia belonging in Schizophrenia.

General note: The heart of this theory is of course that I think that psychiatric disorders are largely caused by immorality in society. Victims of immorality becoming depressed and perpetrators becoming schizophrenic inluding psychopathic. I seek to confirm this by trying to find the most precise ways in examining mental illnesses.
In the smallest sense, immorality causes remorse that puts a load on your brain and works as an obstacle to your serius efforts. Your flow is disturbed by immorality. This is theory, but I bet it gets proven somewhere in the future. Sound moral gives you a better death, better health in life, sharper mind and better approach to problems. So if all this is caused by immorality, what about the mental health business itself? It's my perception that people generally find sound moral code to be boring and uninteresting and that this doesn't make it any better in the actual practice of those who work in mental health business who should be properly introduced to the importance of ethics, morals. Practitioners may find it illusionary meaningful to play political, society organisers and take part in the creation of very immoral stories of people's lives. I suspect detriment tendencies and the actual finding of these. I can only do this much, to the strongest of my belief, to encourage the fine moral approach as an intrinsic value in itself and for the benefit of all! Stay healthy!

There may be some concern that this represents pseudo-science and quackery. I detest having any views that can be categorised as pseudo-science and quackery. I will therefore make it perfectly clear:
My hypothesis: when people are blind to ethical/moral concerns of the type "it's important to follow the laws and be a morally decent person", they can fall victim to conditions that result in schizophrenia and that this path in life in self-reinforcing, f.x. inflicting violence become less and less a concern to you as a person. Consequently, the other side of it is the people who fall prey to these morally ignorant people.
The scientific procedure: I can confirm or defeat this by 2 possible ways. One is to be precise in getting knowledge about people's backgrounds and correlate this with their diagnosis, schizophrenia and depression being the interesting, correlation value of .5 being a total defeat.
The next possibility is this. One can study either societies that are strict on moral code and check with the insanity rate of schizophrenia and depression, these being the only factors of this or I can somehow urge and get people to behave more morally (extremely unlikely, but may be possible) and check for improvements on reported mental health statistics, again, schizophrenia and depression being the interesting.

Not only that, but you also deny future generations to get to know how great an ethical/moral life can be in avoiding schizophrenia/psychopathy. Is this really something you want? What if I'm right, proven by the research, wouldn't it be incredibly nice to know that this ethical/moral life by the general public can eradicate the insanity of schizophrenia and depression and possibly more? If one is to subdue by denial this possible confirmation, one might/may be unscientific in providing truth of the causes to schizophrenia and depression. I think my writing carries a deeply ethical/moral message and I have only the good intentions by coming forward with this.

The absurd privacy argument: the unserious mental health business seems to hide behind an alleged, rather dubiously, privacy vulnerability on behalf of the patients. I must say it's implausible given that they already store medical information, physically or digitally, that's incredibly sensitive and does represent a significant embarassment to the patient in case in gets into the wrong hands. There are also good examples of relatively (equal to all other standards, even the existing ones) safe storage and in digital network like the Police, banking, (health) insurance, communication businesses (telephone and internet companies) and other places that keep information people like to be private.

Obviously, the uneducated have little use in this, except as instilling good ethics/morals in their children and urging the society at large to also conduct according to good ethics/morals.
It's sincerely meant as a just that: the hypothesis/theory. One has to conduct more research into this and apply at the same time greater rigour to procedure, including great care of one's integrity to what one's doing.
It doesn't help you to research rape by raping someone and by raping someone you put yourself in an awkward position to other rape victims you're supposed to help and understand. This is just a notice regarding the practice.
It is enough to have the angle of immorality (by action and/or attitude) toward mental illness, especially schizophrenia. Besides, as schizophrenics "might" be the immoral group, you deny the group of depressed, mentally ill any right to know what is going on in case my hypothesis/theory turns out to be right.

The German flag, an impo-ortant lesson: It may occur funny to you that I write about the German flag on this page, but it has a natural and important cause. This cause is on the issue of the arrangement of the colours. The bottom line is yellow and it is yellow because the white that is supposed to be the bottom line is what makes the money. In earlier times, money, coins, has been yellow or gold, all how you want to see it. White in this regard, is considered a generally good ethics of behaviour to such degree that your being gives a super/subtle impression of white. Going up one level, one is at the red colour and red represents the super/subtle impression of your being when you're not only good, but particularly good, such that you excel in your goodness. Now, the last colour, black, is the colour of super/subtle impression of your being when you're even topping the red level. So in a sense, you're being super-good when you're black. Being black in my experience only happens in short bursts and it requires fine moments of highest intelligence. Above this, there can only be God! Suggesting the flag to be interpreted in its diabolical meaning, moving from the black colour down to the white, can also be done, but I don't want to bother with that now.

Cover: Black can also be a cover at every level. Black cover usually occurs when you're in danger or when something is at stake. It's also possible to "turn on" this black cover by tuning in on that particular emotion that yields a black cover impression. You'll have to test it for yourselves. I've found that "scizophrenics/psychopaths" feed on the good/white(soul impression) people because they have the desired energies of a certain quality. So the encouragement is this. Try to make use of this "black cover" that conceals your good person from being identified by the lunatics and thus being preyed upon. I don't know how good the lunatics are in using this kind of hiding, but I suspect they are less able than the good people.

This writing means that the German flag is a universal flag for all of us and should be celebrated accordingly.

I think there are blatant holes in procedures such as non-existence of watermarked logging files and lack of logging procedures.
There's a general lack of possibility for having one's therapy sessions properly documented by video, possibly making this a quality criterium.
The whole psychiatric practices should be certified by some kind of ISO-standard what concerns document flows and quality criteria of these, possibly also quality-certifying other aspects of the psychiatry.
There should be a possibility of having common spaces monitored by video in cases of rumbles and ensuring security for both staff and patients, possibly making any police work far easier.

It's assumed psychiatry complies with best practices, that it's strictly legal and that this is reflected in the psychiatric hospital departments and institutions. This should include qualified transparency and the possibility to retrace history of treatment.

There may be a good and fast solution as part of diagnostication in correlating with measuring metabolism (by blood sample).

A small remark on Sigmund Freud: I'd like to add by saying that I think there's NO coincidence that the Germans burnt his books after WW2, presumably after having applied Freud's theories on a grand scale! Truly Madness! Long live Humanity, it was indeed the victory of Good over Evil back then!

For ending the serious section of this webpage, I add two links that I think some people may come to appreciate:
Link 1 - Modern Signs in Modern Times
Link 2 - The Warts of Perversion. Taint of Corruption.
Link 3 - Tips and tricks for people who are involved in psychiatry, i.e., the patients.

Yet another link is coming. This one is for good advise that you can set into motion if or when you're in a difficult situation.

Later. I write on the above as I go along. (I will fill in this issue more closely once I get the information into sentences.)

The "categories" above are now reduced to only two, namely, Schizophrenia and Depression. All disorders now fall under these two categories. Please, take note of this. These 2 categories and the way to set up an analysis chart is an invention and result of _my work_ that started out in 2003, formally on the Internet! Good?

As for treatment strategy, psychiatric strategy, and given a few hidden assumptions/customs (by the schema of my suicide argument), I think it's fair to have the position that natural death is to prefer over other strategies that involve these hidden assumptions/customs! That is, if alcohol works (along with medication) then easily death too by that vector!

Please, be considerate over "easily", it's not that "easy", but it follows, possibly and well enough, intellectually to this particular strategy!

Put "enjoyed" in there, please! The text thus:
As for treatment strategy, psychiatric strategy, and given a few hidden assumptions/customs (by the schema of my suicide argument), I think it's fair to have the position that natural death is to prefer over other strategies that involve these hidden assumptions/customs! That is, if alcohol works (along with medication) then death can be enjoyed too by that vector! (Perhaps "enjoyed" is to go too far, but I think you get it.)

I've formerly written that I think that ADMB should file under the Schizophrenic category, although, unknown how far out from the "normal", separating the two categories of Schizophrenia and Depression!
I have been writing also that I place Psychopathy the furthest out in the Schizophrenia category, at least in lack of any "worse" diagnosis. However, schizophrenia itself can probably be placed in various places in its own category, possibly making this as ugly!

The "category" of "Other", not being a category, but a "category"/folder/registry for unplotted/uncertain illnesses in this "Other" category. Which these are, is basically for yourself to decide, but I think Autism is a good choice as a start. This "category" reflects uncertainty about the data sets and how a good description is supposed to relate to the above!
The above relates to The _Two_ Category System of Schizophrenia and Depression!

This is of course a part of my ongoing analysis and work for a more complete Philosophy of Psychiatry as I've been successful in the past on other projects! I also think the Somatist point is a fine one (emphasising careful personal behaviour and personal physical security)!

It may be, incredibly enough, that psychopaths, when on the "psycho path by primary inclination, unrestrained by observers or some or not", picks up a trait in the face or head that makes them appear different, like with a forehead extending from the usual image of the forehead of this person!

This may sound weird and out of place, but these people are "a special club" and "dangerous at that" and that there are _actually_ features, even today, in nature/reality that your little head doesn't know about just yet! Now, it may also be that these people are curiously inclined, because of the _hard_ nature of people they're with, toward "magic with people" and "experiments with people" and that sort, still VERY dangerous and not very known! For you to discover! Be careful!

I just like to insert here the notion of "Normative Research Methods of Psychiatry"! Psychiatry, at least by myself, isn't to be considered as some "trip into a jungle". No, there are probably strict guidelines in place for this and that and that psychiatry is usually guided, officially, by the primary councils, The Scientific Council and The Ethical Council. These two bodies are usually attached to the professional Guilds! For research standards, please see NESH! (More on NESH to follow!)

The NESH URLs:
http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki
http://www.codex.uu.se/en/forskningmedicin.shtml ! Good?

I'm sorry. NESH appears to be a specific Norwegian acronym that translates to The National (of Norway) Research Ethical Committee for the Political Sciences and the Humanities (Den nasjonale forskningsetiske komité for samfunnsfag og humaniora (NESH)), incl. at least psychology, if not psychiatry directly in this instance because they file under the medical conventions!

Cheers!

Further on Telepathy -> Ganzfeldraum and all the rest...
On telepathy: If telepathy, whatever way you see it, provides nothing, 0 results, _then_ you're justified in NOT believing in it, but if it gives you 10/100 then these 10 results may be worth something very special, on skill, almost the same as when jet-fighter pilots begin using their eyes on the sky and get better in it! Not only this, but what fantastic nature doesn't these 10 results hold? I'm telling you, START believing!!!

Further on the plotting: Megalomania sorts under Schizophrenia because of the inclinations to see oneself as a kind of God! That is, Schizophrenics has a tendency to overrate one's own capacity, even saying they're Gods who decide over life and death here and there in the World! Concl: Megalomania under the _category_ of Schizophrenia!

The manic depression, bipolar disorder as it's also named, should be placed under depression. It's really a misnomer to place it elsewhere, I think, because people may become depressed, but pushed upward to a kind of happy manic state by biological inclination toward life (and joy).
Those who have placed people with schizophrenic symptoms under the label of manic-depression are wrong by this system!!!
Manic-depression or Bipolar disorder have formerly been placed under Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). I disagree deeply with this because DID blurs up the diagnostic system and I can't see the definite use for the concept of DID in its current form!

Note: this is now transferred from Whatiswritten777 blog and the project is about 15 days of entering its 7th year, that is, 21.12.2011! Cheers!