"The 100% Society - A Matter of Political Science" is this: In relation to the "100% Society", I think there are 2 major concerns. One is the justice system and how to achieve this society by what kind of regulation/laws. The other is how business is supposed to be organised everywhere in the world for people to be employed (<95, that is, maximally 5% unemployment) and for rewarding profit and utility to be made along with it. I'll deliberate more on this as the days pass by...
100% Society: the business plan... I'm coming back to this, but it should already be clear that this is about symmetry of both competence and industry between nations all over planet earth (and other potential places as well). So how to do it? I'll think about it... Symmetry in this sense is understood as competence and industry divided over the nation's citizens. You can't assume that Belgium is capable of setting up everything from complete aircraft factories to assembly lines for spacecrafts and satellites and building aircraft carriers in the same breath. Belgium has only 10,8 Mill. inhabitants and it can only do this much...
100% Society: I've already written about the Data Storage Directory on my blog that I think should be implemented as part of this idea. There should also be sufficient possibilities to defend oneself by guns, tazers and pepperspray canisters. I would also let the Police do the necessary surveillance by video cameras either by possible harddisk review from scenery or by actual monitoring and control. The 2 options are both good. This surveillance should cover the most used places, the places by most people-traffic. One should also allow private people do their own video-surveillance of private space and property including estate-entrance. The rest of the laws can basically remain as they are. Social justice: I think it's fair to allow people who "fall through" a kind of safety net, an arrangement of benefits for the newborn/kids, unemployed, the disabled and the retired. This should secure decency and stable society (without desperation). I've yet to consider the definite divide between a kind of private arrangement and public arrangement, but there should be no doubt that the 2 can go well together, with the private option being more rewarding than the public one, especially in the scope of retirement. This should be mostly it. The other laws can remain basically the same. By guns, I mean primarily the handguns (I favour the pistols). I see absolutely NO need for automatic weapons in private hands except as part of the home-guard, possibly, but not necessarily. Today there are storage places all over the country (Norway) for the home-guard and the army and sufficiently so for preventing any Police State/Dictatorship to take place. Also by handguns, I'm thinking of the 9mms or some thereof as it provides sufficient "stopping power". Important remark: I've not implied a single, tiny intrusion on people's privacy, classically speaking, i.e., within your private space, at the loos, at the private meeting where ever, every private place and property, and also not in all public buildings. You're right, of course, potentially, I see every little inch of public space, "under the blue sky", as surveilled, but only potentially. (By response to Impenitent on the PN forum.)
100% Society: Everybody knows there are hidden and tacit business routines around the world even if OPEC remains the most open, I've already asked for the syndication of all primary industry like aquaculture, fishing, agriculture, mining and all else. This is for the betterment of workers in these kinds of industry simply. We already know that most agriculture is very organised in the "Western" world to the point where we can't anymore claim those profits are given by competition, but rather the reasonable demand from the industry itself due to expenses of making the agriculture go around and for the workers to receive decent salary. We should admit this elegance to the rest of the world, obviously for the same betterment of living and opportunities that we enjoy ourselves or those next door.
100% Society further: This is not all, however, we need to start out projects that evaluate what kind of diversion of industry over this same kind of symmetry is needed in respect to cost and opportunity for abolishing unemployment. This can easily be socialised and effectuated by import barriers to make the desired level of price of product and for giving the "right" (social) message to the exporting country that its prices for this particular product is too low for this area to be (safely) sustainable most importantly in terms of employment! This SHOULD be accepted by the WTO given that the members begin to agree on this kind of agenda that makes the symmetry formula to the world the norm/normative! I would be HARD on this issue, making a ferocious campaign if necessary! Comment as precursor to the Idea of the 100% Society: I'll also write some on the "100% Society" in some time to come, both in response to Popper's political comment and to the much hated and paranoid Welles' "1984", according to myself. Much of "1984" is deeply unfounded, I think. And to be educated is also to seek rationality in others, thus this Police State regime is probably put away for ever. More later...
Note: This has first been written on the open group on Facebook by the name, Thoughts from mr. Terje Lea, 16.12.2010, 18.12.2010 and 20.12.2010.) http://blog.t-lea.net/#post119 I now find that the idea of The 100% Society now has grown so big that it needs its own text. This will continue to grow until all compilation ´has taken place and the idea itself has been completely desribed! Special thanks go to other people who, like myself (now, according to my text on descriptive science as minimum) have strong views about the political science as science in line with engineering ideas and other and not something else!
Some extra note due to Blogger idiocy:
Posted by L.F.O.-L. at 03:05:00
Labels: Karl Popper's LSE, Open Society and Its Enemies, political science, response to Karl Popper, The 100% Society
2 comments:
1.
L.F.O.-L.22 May 2012 03:08
This is /the/ serious addition of mine to the (serious) contribution of Karl Popper to this field, on how society should be shaped and how it should look!
2.
L.F.O.-L.22 May 2012 03:10
The poor formatting of this text is due to the unknown mr. Editor out there on the Internet, working with Blogger or Mozilla or other (like standards work)...
The above has been the former record over at Whatiswritten777.blogspot.com.
Wednesday, 1 August 2012
The Encumbrance Theory of Intelligence - ETI
The Encumbrance Theory of Intelligence (ETI) - Philosophy of
Psychology?
I'm not against operationalism of intelligence expressed as I.Q. I think it can be very useful and I also like the fact that the systems are continually reviewed and improved.
This theory assumes that the mind continuously considers objects of interest, both necessary and optional. When one puts the mind to something this process runs until the mind deems it finished, temporarily or finally.
The ETI is the notion that people who are caught in struggles in life scores lower on I.Q.-tests than their non-trifled counterparts. The premise is that those who are caught in difficult struggles have to devote resources of their consciousness to the problem so when these are tested, their mind is simultaneously considering other issues as well on some level. In a sense they are not truly free, enjoying freedom.
Unencumbered people are free to be as aggressive on intellectual challenges as much as their hearts can pump blood through the brain. They have no serious worries occupying their minds.
Besides, in this, I assume that people are made up of "souls" and are initially equally perfect. It's the environment that hooks up their processes of consc. to the level of their current picture of intelligence, say I.Q. That is, reality is detriment to the ideal, "soul" condition. Obviously, I don't argue from the premise of souls which I find rather distasteful at the present moment. Nurture can do a lot to people, I find. I say this so that you may get a clue from where I'm coming from. In a sense, people are perfect as reactions from the factors of life. Edit: "That is, reality is detriment to the ideal, "soul" condition." Don't get me wrong! It's apparent that you build your intelligence through the course of life and that death, of what we know for sure, extinguishes both life and intelligence.
Alright! This is the start. There will be more.
I look forward to your opinions! Feel free to throw in what you think is appropriate! There is a book on the other side of "The Bell Curve" that I'm looking for, but it's not "The Bell Curve Discussion". Any suggestions?
I agree that my theory doesn't account for physical (genetic) defects or brain diseases. It's the case that I don't intend to make it that way. I can however interpret you to mean also the physical structure that is supposed to make the impression of qualia or whatever and in this respect also, my theory is flat. I hold that if the brain is relatively healthy, my theory says something despite relatively small differences. Two people who score 170 in IQ are analogous to two people who bench 150 kg. I see no important differences between those two sets. I agree that intelligence is a complex issue (therefore operationalism), but I also have the impression that smart people in science are quite open to talk about intelligence and what makes them good. Access to data is plentiful in other words.
On ETI further as clarification:
Clarification: My intelligence theory comes on top of these other three factors, the basic foundation:
1. Diet issues as in staying healthy, eating (accepting some deviation, perhaps) relevant food.
2. Physical exercise, as in having a good pulse band to move in, both for calm and for intensity, during harder working periods when inspiration is peeking or when impportant work is being completed.
3. Mental exercise, being pro-active, toward information, solving puzzles, riddles, having control on "IQ-tests-patterns-for-testing" (not knowing exactly what they are, though) and the sort, i.e., knowing what intelligence is and how the science goes!
Alright, sum is, all in all, 3 groups to care for before my ETI enters as described!
Note: the time stamps from the forum put proper, Posted 07/24/09 - 04:17 PM; forums.philosophyforums.com and Posted 07/23/09 - 10:13 PM; forums.philosophyforums.com.
I'm not against operationalism of intelligence expressed as I.Q. I think it can be very useful and I also like the fact that the systems are continually reviewed and improved.
This theory assumes that the mind continuously considers objects of interest, both necessary and optional. When one puts the mind to something this process runs until the mind deems it finished, temporarily or finally.
The ETI is the notion that people who are caught in struggles in life scores lower on I.Q.-tests than their non-trifled counterparts. The premise is that those who are caught in difficult struggles have to devote resources of their consciousness to the problem so when these are tested, their mind is simultaneously considering other issues as well on some level. In a sense they are not truly free, enjoying freedom.
Unencumbered people are free to be as aggressive on intellectual challenges as much as their hearts can pump blood through the brain. They have no serious worries occupying their minds.
Besides, in this, I assume that people are made up of "souls" and are initially equally perfect. It's the environment that hooks up their processes of consc. to the level of their current picture of intelligence, say I.Q. That is, reality is detriment to the ideal, "soul" condition. Obviously, I don't argue from the premise of souls which I find rather distasteful at the present moment. Nurture can do a lot to people, I find. I say this so that you may get a clue from where I'm coming from. In a sense, people are perfect as reactions from the factors of life. Edit: "That is, reality is detriment to the ideal, "soul" condition." Don't get me wrong! It's apparent that you build your intelligence through the course of life and that death, of what we know for sure, extinguishes both life and intelligence.
Alright! This is the start. There will be more.
I look forward to your opinions! Feel free to throw in what you think is appropriate! There is a book on the other side of "The Bell Curve" that I'm looking for, but it's not "The Bell Curve Discussion". Any suggestions?
I agree that my theory doesn't account for physical (genetic) defects or brain diseases. It's the case that I don't intend to make it that way. I can however interpret you to mean also the physical structure that is supposed to make the impression of qualia or whatever and in this respect also, my theory is flat. I hold that if the brain is relatively healthy, my theory says something despite relatively small differences. Two people who score 170 in IQ are analogous to two people who bench 150 kg. I see no important differences between those two sets. I agree that intelligence is a complex issue (therefore operationalism), but I also have the impression that smart people in science are quite open to talk about intelligence and what makes them good. Access to data is plentiful in other words.
On ETI further as clarification:
Clarification: My intelligence theory comes on top of these other three factors, the basic foundation:
1. Diet issues as in staying healthy, eating (accepting some deviation, perhaps) relevant food.
2. Physical exercise, as in having a good pulse band to move in, both for calm and for intensity, during harder working periods when inspiration is peeking or when impportant work is being completed.
3. Mental exercise, being pro-active, toward information, solving puzzles, riddles, having control on "IQ-tests-patterns-for-testing" (not knowing exactly what they are, though) and the sort, i.e., knowing what intelligence is and how the science goes!
Alright, sum is, all in all, 3 groups to care for before my ETI enters as described!
Note: the time stamps from the forum put proper, Posted 07/24/09 - 04:17 PM; forums.philosophyforums.com and Posted 07/23/09 - 10:13 PM; forums.philosophyforums.com.
Monday, 23 July 2012
The Turing Test Forever Defeated - Challenges for the Turing Test
Concerning the Turing test, I find that the requirements toward _generic
language output_ should be definite and that the programming needs to _not_
extend certain limits of size so that the computer _really_ generates language
of human quality and not that it is allowed such extension that one enters all
sorts of typical pattern of human behaviour that the programming by this notion
*defeats itse...lf*, making the whole programming ridiculous and more apt for
artificial intelligence _emulating_ human behaviour *only*!!! One should also
take into account the phenomenon of "Truthiness" and "telepathy" so as to see
that the "Turing test" is now utterly defeated regardless, because computers
can't pick up these extraordinary capacities of human kind!!! Good?
Urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test !
Url2: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/truthiness?rdfrom=Truthiness !
Quote: "truthy + -ness. First attested in 1824."
Quote: American Dialect Society's Word of the Year (2005)
Url3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness ! Quote from this: "Truthiness, although a "stunt word", was named Word of the Year for 2005 by the American Dialect Society and for 2006 by Merriam-Webster.[7][8] Linguist and OED consultant Benjamin Zimmer[2][9] pointed out that the word truthiness[10] already had a history in literature and appears in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), as a derivation of truthy, and The Century Dictionary, both of which indicate it as rare or dialectal, and to be defined more straightforwardly as "truthfulness, faithfulness".[2]"
Conclusion either way is that the Turing test is forever defeated, given all honesty, and that the matters that remain now is how long the computer can hold and "small questions" of challenges merely for having the computer to behave like a human being in being engaged in a speech, very advanced, all allowed, or not!
First written to Facebook, both under my profile and as a note with the same header as above.
Urls: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test !
Url2: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/truthiness?rdfrom=Truthiness !
Quote: "truthy + -ness. First attested in 1824."
Quote: American Dialect Society's Word of the Year (2005)
Url3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness ! Quote from this: "Truthiness, although a "stunt word", was named Word of the Year for 2005 by the American Dialect Society and for 2006 by Merriam-Webster.[7][8] Linguist and OED consultant Benjamin Zimmer[2][9] pointed out that the word truthiness[10] already had a history in literature and appears in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), as a derivation of truthy, and The Century Dictionary, both of which indicate it as rare or dialectal, and to be defined more straightforwardly as "truthfulness, faithfulness".[2]"
Conclusion either way is that the Turing test is forever defeated, given all honesty, and that the matters that remain now is how long the computer can hold and "small questions" of challenges merely for having the computer to behave like a human being in being engaged in a speech, very advanced, all allowed, or not!
First written to Facebook, both under my profile and as a note with the same header as above.
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
The 100% Society - A Matter of Political Science
"The 100% Society - A Matter of Political Science" is this:
The Idea of the 100% Society
Opprettet av Terje Lea 2011-01-14 07:32:33 [CET], started as a blog posting.
In relation to the "100% Society", I think there are 2 major concerns. One is the justice system and how to achieve this society by what kind of regulation/laws. The other is how business is supposed to be organised everywhere in the world for people to be employed ( >95% or more ) and for rewarding profit and utility to be made along with it. I'll deliberate more on this as the days pass by...
100% Society: the business plan... I'm coming back to this, but it should already be clear that this is about symmetry of both competence and industry between nations all over planet earth (and other potential places as well). So how to do it? I'll think about it... Symmetry in this sense is understood as competence and industry divided over the nation's citizens. You can't assume that Belgium is capable of setting up everything from complete aircraft factories to assembly lines for spacecrafts and satellites and building aircraft carriers in the same breath. Belgium has only 10,8 Mill. inhabitants and it can only do this much...
100% Society: I've already written about the Data Storage Directory on my blog that I think should be implemented as part of this idea. There should also be sufficient possibilities to defend oneself by guns, tazers and pepperspray canisters. I would also let the Police do the necessary surveillance by video cameras either by possible harddisk review from scenery or by actual monitoring and control. The 2 options are both good. This surveillance should cover the most used places, the places by most people-traffic. One should also allow private people do their own video-surveillance of private space and property including estate-entrance. The rest of the laws can basically remain as they are. Social justice: I think it's fair to allow people who "fall through" a kind of safety net, an arrangement of benefits for the newborn/kids, unemployed, the disabled and the retired. This should secure decency and stable society (without desperation). I've yet to consider the definite divide between a kind of private arrangement and public arrangement, but there should be no doubt that the 2 can go well together, with the private option being more rewarding than the public one, especially in the scope of retirement. This should be mostly it. The other laws can remain basically the same. By guns, I mean primarily the handguns (I favour the pistols). I see absolutely NO need for automatic weapons in private hands except as part of the home-guard, possibly, but not necessarily. Today there are storage places all over the country (Norway) for the home-guard and the army and sufficiently so for preventing any Police State/Dictatorship to take place. Also by handguns, I'm thinking of the 9mms or some thereof as it provides sufficient "stopping power". Important remark: I've not implied a single, tiny intrusion on people's privacy, classically speaking, i.e., within your private space, at the loos, at the private meeting where ever, every private place and property, and also not in all public buildings. You're right, of course, potentially, I see every little inch of public space, "under the blue sky", as surveilled, but only potentially. (By response to Impenitent on the PN forum.)
100% Society: Everybody knows there are hidden and tacit business routines around the world even if OPEC remains the most open, I've already asked for the syndication of all primary industry like aquaculture, fishing, agriculture, mining and all else. This is for the betterment of workers in these kinds of industry simply. We already know that most agriculture is very organised in the "Western" world to the point where we can't anymore claim those profits are given by competition, but rather the reasonable demand from the industry itself due to expenses of making the agriculture go around and for the workers to receive decent salary. We should admit this elegance to the rest of the world, obviously for the same betterment of living and opportunities that we enjoy ourselves or those next door.
100% Society further: This is not all, however, we need to start out projects that evaluate what kind of diversion of industry over this same kind of symmetry is needed in respect to cost and opportunity for abolishing unemployment. This can easily be socialised and effectuated by import barriers to make the desired level of price of product and for giving the "right" (social) message to the exporting country that its prices for this particular product is too low for this area to be (safely) sustainable most importantly in terms of employment! This SHOULD be accepted by the WTO given that the members begin to agree on this kind of agenda that makes the symmetry formula to the world the norm/normative! I would be HARD on this issue, making a ferocious campaign if necessary!
Comment as precursor to the Idea of the 100% Society: I'll also write some on the "100% Society" in some time to come, both in response to Popper's political comment and to the much hated and paranoid Welles' "1984", according to myself. Much of "1984" is deeply unfounded, I think. And to be educated is also to seek rationality in others, thus this Police State regime is probably put away for ever. More later...
(This has first been written on the open group on Facebook by the name, Thoughts from mr. Terje Lea, 16.12.2010, 18.12.2010 and 20.12.2010.) http://blog.t-lea.net/#post119 I now find that the idea of The 100% Society now has grown so big that it needs its own text. This will continue to grow until all compilation ´has taken place and the idea itself has been completely desribed! Special thanks go to other people who, like myself (now, according to my text on descriptive science as minimum) have strong views about the political science as science in line with engineering ideas and other and not something else!
Opprettet av Terje Lea 2011-01-14 07:32:33 [CET], started as a blog posting.
In relation to the "100% Society", I think there are 2 major concerns. One is the justice system and how to achieve this society by what kind of regulation/laws. The other is how business is supposed to be organised everywhere in the world for people to be employed ( >95% or more ) and for rewarding profit and utility to be made along with it. I'll deliberate more on this as the days pass by...
100% Society: the business plan... I'm coming back to this, but it should already be clear that this is about symmetry of both competence and industry between nations all over planet earth (and other potential places as well). So how to do it? I'll think about it... Symmetry in this sense is understood as competence and industry divided over the nation's citizens. You can't assume that Belgium is capable of setting up everything from complete aircraft factories to assembly lines for spacecrafts and satellites and building aircraft carriers in the same breath. Belgium has only 10,8 Mill. inhabitants and it can only do this much...
100% Society: I've already written about the Data Storage Directory on my blog that I think should be implemented as part of this idea. There should also be sufficient possibilities to defend oneself by guns, tazers and pepperspray canisters. I would also let the Police do the necessary surveillance by video cameras either by possible harddisk review from scenery or by actual monitoring and control. The 2 options are both good. This surveillance should cover the most used places, the places by most people-traffic. One should also allow private people do their own video-surveillance of private space and property including estate-entrance. The rest of the laws can basically remain as they are. Social justice: I think it's fair to allow people who "fall through" a kind of safety net, an arrangement of benefits for the newborn/kids, unemployed, the disabled and the retired. This should secure decency and stable society (without desperation). I've yet to consider the definite divide between a kind of private arrangement and public arrangement, but there should be no doubt that the 2 can go well together, with the private option being more rewarding than the public one, especially in the scope of retirement. This should be mostly it. The other laws can remain basically the same. By guns, I mean primarily the handguns (I favour the pistols). I see absolutely NO need for automatic weapons in private hands except as part of the home-guard, possibly, but not necessarily. Today there are storage places all over the country (Norway) for the home-guard and the army and sufficiently so for preventing any Police State/Dictatorship to take place. Also by handguns, I'm thinking of the 9mms or some thereof as it provides sufficient "stopping power". Important remark: I've not implied a single, tiny intrusion on people's privacy, classically speaking, i.e., within your private space, at the loos, at the private meeting where ever, every private place and property, and also not in all public buildings. You're right, of course, potentially, I see every little inch of public space, "under the blue sky", as surveilled, but only potentially. (By response to Impenitent on the PN forum.)
100% Society: Everybody knows there are hidden and tacit business routines around the world even if OPEC remains the most open, I've already asked for the syndication of all primary industry like aquaculture, fishing, agriculture, mining and all else. This is for the betterment of workers in these kinds of industry simply. We already know that most agriculture is very organised in the "Western" world to the point where we can't anymore claim those profits are given by competition, but rather the reasonable demand from the industry itself due to expenses of making the agriculture go around and for the workers to receive decent salary. We should admit this elegance to the rest of the world, obviously for the same betterment of living and opportunities that we enjoy ourselves or those next door.
100% Society further: This is not all, however, we need to start out projects that evaluate what kind of diversion of industry over this same kind of symmetry is needed in respect to cost and opportunity for abolishing unemployment. This can easily be socialised and effectuated by import barriers to make the desired level of price of product and for giving the "right" (social) message to the exporting country that its prices for this particular product is too low for this area to be (safely) sustainable most importantly in terms of employment! This SHOULD be accepted by the WTO given that the members begin to agree on this kind of agenda that makes the symmetry formula to the world the norm/normative! I would be HARD on this issue, making a ferocious campaign if necessary!
Comment as precursor to the Idea of the 100% Society: I'll also write some on the "100% Society" in some time to come, both in response to Popper's political comment and to the much hated and paranoid Welles' "1984", according to myself. Much of "1984" is deeply unfounded, I think. And to be educated is also to seek rationality in others, thus this Police State regime is probably put away for ever. More later...
(This has first been written on the open group on Facebook by the name, Thoughts from mr. Terje Lea, 16.12.2010, 18.12.2010 and 20.12.2010.) http://blog.t-lea.net/#post119 I now find that the idea of The 100% Society now has grown so big that it needs its own text. This will continue to grow until all compilation ´has taken place and the idea itself has been completely desribed! Special thanks go to other people who, like myself (now, according to my text on descriptive science as minimum) have strong views about the political science as science in line with engineering ideas and other and not something else!
Monday, 21 May 2012
Greenspanism - A Descriptive Approach - Salutations to China in Africa!
The original formulation as written to Twitter:
The #Greenspanism is the following: you increase flow of money to the banks by lower ECB rates and allow deeper deficits while controlling the inflation. And inflation needs to be stable and this is done by keeping people working with "substantial/valuable" work, that is, the inflation. And inflation needs to be stable and this is done by keeping people working with "substantial/valuable" work, that is, NOT filling gas tanks with air just to release it again... No, they are to provide wanted/needed services and products and this is monitored by engineers and various other pollers, "signal people" while "having food on the table and housing is secured"! That should make the trick as we go to the work OF ALL THAT MAKES US HUMAN, regardless of what USA does! Because they want to do all, but we do it smarter and more generously/democratic, perhaps...! We'll see! Cheers!
Additional comment:
Of course, Greenspanism hinges on evaluation of market values and contribution to these ends. But this is not so complex as it may first seem, starting with the dairy businesses, and food making businesses, and TV and banking, and construction, other infrastructure, like telephone/IT... and so on... so you see that from merely /being/ a society A LOT of value comes into being "almost" by itself! It's just for you to fill up, fashion too, entertainment and the rest!
Additional comments, 2 and 3:
So as the inflation needs to be tolerable (starting highest, depending on development level and need for input of "liquids" into the currency system): inflation can thus be allowed every year to be 0,1 % - 10%, I suggest for a healthy system, but no higher and stable because there are supposed to be _no_ year over 10% (non-dogmatically, /can/ exceed if necessary). Deflation is by this a luxury problem, you just have that fine surplus to start thinking about!!!
Greenspanism: holding a currency policy active so that the necessary initiative is produced for banks and investors to invest or loan with (the appropriate/low) risk so that unemployment is most effectively combatted! All in all, the slogan is: the money is supposed to work for the people!!! (At least, this is the strategy I expect Alan Greenspan is going to be mostly remembered for in leaving a legacy to the World!)
All in all, nr. 2, Greenspanism is an investor aggressive central bank policy and should be managed carefully, i.e., the considerations of evaluating the suggestion on the table, that the investment opportunity holds enough "substance"/value!!!
A normal year, thereof, by empirical findings, fx. EU annual accounts of its members' budget deficits, and given full development, i.e., typically OECD countries, is something like 1-4% inflation, which is stable enough for companies and citizens alike! Cheers!
Note: First written to Twitter on 31. Jan, 2012 (CET) and additional words added firstly to Facebook today, about 3 AM CEST, 21. May, 2012!
Note: Add. comments added today, 5. May, 2012 (CEST-zone-wise).
Saturday, 21 April 2012
Why Your Mobile Phone Can Be Completely Secure Without PUK!
This requires a user-set code for Telephone Lock and Recovery Code (perhaps also an own "internet"/"smart" phone security code against internet intrusion on a "handcuff-"basis (the password is coded securely within the mob.phone as well as with the user, making up a set of "handcuffs". This alone should normally give very good security... along with the usual options for security. However, there's another option that gives even harder protection and this is to "define data types" to enter the mob. phone on harder premises, fx. only stnd. html, https, only approved "white list" apps. and so on... This can be seen as rolling by to a more advanced WAP-programming and making the World less US American dependent, that is "Creative Programming Allowed (In)" -> Unchecked! I don't accept robot-arguments/subversive arguments from the mob. phone companies themselves, that is, how they have "this "God"-ability to do this and that and that therefore all that I say is invalid" (thi-hi-hi-hi). You know what I mean... Also, you may call this kind of mob.phone the (motherf**king, excuse me) DUMB phone!!!
This should also leave that "special" necessity "for security forces, special operatives and /the/ very agents and other important people, like some business people... to themselves and who can well set up and USE those good /robot/ phones which they are probably very fond of"! Besides, no-one of us normal people are really that important and with some good back-up routines with software to follow, there is no more problem than buying a new phone and /recycle/ the old and lost one!
Remember that the (old) chip holding your phone number is still very important in this in linking your subscription uniquely to your subscription scheme, by address and possibly bank-account for "not holding a criminal phone line" so to speak, that you're a responsible phone owner... (Police state or not, there's a solution on my blogs for dealing with this "problem" by itself...)
Note: First written to Facebook just moments ago!
Sunday, 15 April 2012
Note on Research on Parkinson's and Alzheimer's
On top of my own writings on Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, asserting
basically that there are personality precursors to them, Dag Aarsland
has received a research prize by University Hospital of Stavanger.
The story is covered here in Norwegian:
http://www.helse-stavanger.no/aktuelt/nyheter/Sider/forskningskonferansen-2011.aspx !
My original web-page has been this:
Parkinson's is a little more complex. I think it goes like this: If one cares to look after, I think there is needed a too strong a stimulation from bodily neurology that has made the body cease to work properly. Almost like becoming less of feelings, the stimuli from working properly has set into a subliminal process of becoming higher and higher and therefore the disease feels like a strait-jacket. If I was in position, I would introspect for lack of discipline with regards to sensitivity or of a deeper negativity, like one seeking a higher or unacceptably higher bodily stimulation. One can also look for the combination of these. Thoughts were that it could be possible to reveal this by a set questionnaires early on but I haven't got the access to data nor the possibly of establishing a test bench practice of this sort. If one watches it with regards to good physical exercise and keeps a healthy, positive attitude, I don't think Parkinson's will ever become a problem. There's no doubt that personality plays a role in determining the relationship to both yourself and your body. If you want to do it all away, just get yourself into a car-crash and then you know where you've taken yourself, into the very car-crash!
Here are some facts and reference for Parkinson's Disease:
Affects about 120,000 people in the UK
Most people who get Parkinson's are aged 50 or over
A loss of nerve cells in the brain causes the symptoms of Parkinson's to appear
From a BBC information page.
Dementia is classified along with Alzheimer's, I've seen recently. I think this is a good step. Dementia is, along these former lines, the beginning of the descent to death, the onset of a dying brain. Discipline on one's mindset, possibly being also one's morality, and mindful activities should take away the possibility for Dementia to occur. Yet, it's my sense that there are incentives in the patient for Dementia to occur in the first place so perhaps Dementia is a matter of personality traits and as such, is difficult to handle. I'm wondering a little bit if Dementia can occur as a result of inactivity by deep resentment. If you have the idea that the society or whatever your environment is, isn't worth your efforts, inactivity is an option, but I think it's a poorer choice than suicide, even though seeking unhealthy living style in combination with decadence/inactivity may be a possibility to this end. Be healthy!
By
Terje Lea, 27. August 2005, 19. April 2010 and 4. May 2010
<Back
Note: First published to the blogs on Whatiswritten777 by Sunday, 16 October 2011.
The story is covered here in Norwegian:
http://www.helse-stavanger.no/aktuelt/nyheter/Sider/forskningskonferansen-2011.aspx !
My original web-page has been this:
Thoughts concerning Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease and Dementia
Alzheimer's is the steady dying of the brain. If one stiffens from stimulating the brain, the brain usually decrease the activity. The person gets so used to own thought-routines or thought-patterns that the brain slowly decreases in the overall activity. When the brain reaches a certain level there is usually a too strong brain or thought behaviour in order too correct ones own behaviour. I think it symbols the early sunset of a person's life. Compared to the healthy life of a normal person, the death of a normal person is in the form of going to sleep and never wake up again. This is the normal sunset of a life. One grows old and dies from old age. If you keep a high, positive brain activity and seek new solutions and refresh the way of looking at things, you will be free from Alzheimer'sParkinson's is a little more complex. I think it goes like this: If one cares to look after, I think there is needed a too strong a stimulation from bodily neurology that has made the body cease to work properly. Almost like becoming less of feelings, the stimuli from working properly has set into a subliminal process of becoming higher and higher and therefore the disease feels like a strait-jacket. If I was in position, I would introspect for lack of discipline with regards to sensitivity or of a deeper negativity, like one seeking a higher or unacceptably higher bodily stimulation. One can also look for the combination of these. Thoughts were that it could be possible to reveal this by a set questionnaires early on but I haven't got the access to data nor the possibly of establishing a test bench practice of this sort. If one watches it with regards to good physical exercise and keeps a healthy, positive attitude, I don't think Parkinson's will ever become a problem. There's no doubt that personality plays a role in determining the relationship to both yourself and your body. If you want to do it all away, just get yourself into a car-crash and then you know where you've taken yourself, into the very car-crash!
Here are some facts and reference for Parkinson's Disease:
Affects about 120,000 people in the UK
Most people who get Parkinson's are aged 50 or over
A loss of nerve cells in the brain causes the symptoms of Parkinson's to appear
From a BBC information page.
Dementia is classified along with Alzheimer's, I've seen recently. I think this is a good step. Dementia is, along these former lines, the beginning of the descent to death, the onset of a dying brain. Discipline on one's mindset, possibly being also one's morality, and mindful activities should take away the possibility for Dementia to occur. Yet, it's my sense that there are incentives in the patient for Dementia to occur in the first place so perhaps Dementia is a matter of personality traits and as such, is difficult to handle. I'm wondering a little bit if Dementia can occur as a result of inactivity by deep resentment. If you have the idea that the society or whatever your environment is, isn't worth your efforts, inactivity is an option, but I think it's a poorer choice than suicide, even though seeking unhealthy living style in combination with decadence/inactivity may be a possibility to this end. Be healthy!
By
Terje Lea, 27. August 2005, 19. April 2010 and 4. May 2010
<Back
Note: First published to the blogs on Whatiswritten777 by Sunday, 16 October 2011.
On the Phenomena of MRSA, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
It's my view, in light of the 60 Minutes report, that MRSA has its roots
in overprescription of antibiotics as well as the abuse of bacteria
killing detergents rather than using "clean" petrol-based detergents
(like the Zalo basic of Norway, old variety) and alcohol-based
countermeasures! You can also include chlorine-based detergents and the
rest of the traditional products (esp. the ammoniac-based). In fact, I'd
draw a line in time when to STOP developing new ones (and I think this
will serve the developing countries well)!
Hand-soap and general body-soap should also be of the "non-bacteria" killing kind, that is, it's not a specialised detergent for killing bacteria, i.e., it consists chemically of the traditional set of detergents. So the conclusion and advise with this, is of course to use the traditional products, enhanced, but only up to a point, for the daily use. Hospitals use of course the whole range as they see fit and as they act under expert ethics and professionalism, esp. the knowledge!
As with cancer, you die from the rest of the conditions (by failing immune system, etc). There is no use to try to dodge this, outside the hospital treatment!
From my former Facebook writings some time ago, just for keeping a line of recorded judgments alive.This time it has been taken from "Thoughts from mr. Terje Lea", the forerunner to "Static Display..."!
Hand-soap and general body-soap should also be of the "non-bacteria" killing kind, that is, it's not a specialised detergent for killing bacteria, i.e., it consists chemically of the traditional set of detergents. So the conclusion and advise with this, is of course to use the traditional products, enhanced, but only up to a point, for the daily use. Hospitals use of course the whole range as they see fit and as they act under expert ethics and professionalism, esp. the knowledge!
As with cancer, you die from the rest of the conditions (by failing immune system, etc). There is no use to try to dodge this, outside the hospital treatment!
From my former Facebook writings some time ago, just for keeping a line of recorded judgments alive.This time it has been taken from "Thoughts from mr. Terje Lea", the forerunner to "Static Display..."!
4 comments:
- From "The Yeti-monster"/"Uncle Tony" of New York(!): /As if they could get away with it.../ "Stuffed birds...!" "Antibacterial detergents" nowadays -> The real data-set of anti-bacterial (det.), I supsect, is now disappearing further down into history in what I will describe as a cover-up (history) by the chemists and the med. doctors of cleanliness (epidemiologists or so)!!! This is now also a kind of DDT history equiv. if my suspicions prove right, entered into history of science, one that one can keep a checker on!!!
I think that the premise for the anti-bacterial det. have been to make a fluid that would be applied by itself, never needing the rinsing of water... This has been the "sci-fi" dream of these people! (Now that is now coming to a halt where water is still needed on some level for purposes of cleanliness, probably to some irritation still to "these very modern people", of course, /less/ of using water so as to give rise to MRSA and the rest...! Then what does it mean?
"Anti-bacterial" by cover-up story, now as word-dressing: Zalo brand by Lilleborg, (Contains among other compounds:) 1. 15-30% Anionic (positive ions solution?) surface active substances. 2. 5-15% Non-ionic surface active substances. "Amfotic" surface active substances. 3. Under/less than 5% Sodiumsalicylat (some of the same as in acetylic salicylic acid for headaches, comment) Methylisothiazolinone. Perfume (by 6 different substances). Compare with... (/The/ traditional...)
Zalo as in ordinary Zalo, also "natural", again by Lilleborg: 1. 15-30% Anionic (positive ions solution?) surface active substances. 2. 5-15% Non-ionic surface active substances. "Amfotic" surface active substances. 3. Under/less than 5% 2-Bromine2-nitropropane-1,3-diol. Sodiumbenzoat. Perfume (by 2 different substances (of the 6 above, that is, they are the same, by this "fresh lemon" scented variety).
Note: From Facebook where it has been first written to some 8 hours ago in this CE_S_T zone (starting 25. March). Cheers!
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
The Higgs Kill List
The Challenges to the Higgs' (All) - Killing it?
I just add the list, *The Kill List* for the Higgs':
Why the Higgs' field of the Universe when the Universe is (mostly?) "best" vacuum?!
How does Higgs' fit into the Unifying work of Physics?
Is it really necessary to have the Higgs-Boson to explain mass?
Why can't ordinary particles have mass simply by property, that is, mass is part of their nature?
Even then, why is it necessary for mass to "obtain" rather than to be as in "gravity", one form or another, i.e., explanation?
"Technicolour" isn't an alternative as it confuses "energy" and "forces"?
Wasn't the intention in the first place (by 3,5 TeV/7 TeV) to smash these pieces smaller? So that the Protons would be split to smaller bits? Then CERN presents masses on 125 GeV? What?
The Up Quark has mass 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c(2) and 125 GeV(/c(2)) means something bigger than the Protons even, so you're considering "fusion effects" of the Protons to be the Higgs-Boson?
Finally, the realism: To summarise the masses: Higgs Boson is suggested to 125 GeV(/c(2)), Proton 938.272046(21) MeV(/c2), W boson, 80.398±0.023 GeV/c2, Z boson, 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2 and (finally) the Up quark 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c2! Good? Merry Christmas!
Reaction, as in the military: Add the Photon Theory by asserting (plausibly) that "Photons are the smallest constituents of all matter. I assume the other particles of the Standard Model are made up of photons. Why is this? The sun burns mass and to my knowledge it only/mostly by far emits electromagnetic radiation, consequently in the form of photons. When a nuclear bomb explodes, it converts matter into electromagnetic radiation, energy of various forms. Compared to this, I think one can throw the string theory out the window along with dimensions beyond the usual 4 (I'm not certain about this concerning Einstein's theories that I'd like to keep as it is). Also, let's assume higher intensity radiation emits more dense amounts of photons and that it declines further down the electromagnetic spectrum.
(Extra: New on photons: I think I can also hold that photons are "semi-fluid" on a hyper-level (of course). I don't know what this adds to our view of reality, but it's a possible way of reconciling the wave-particle duality.)" On top of the Photon Theory: Unifying work -> full speed ahead!
You may want to check out Slashdot org under "LHC Homes In On Possible Higgs Boson Around 126GeV", message nr. 207, and The Kill List and the Photon Theory that's added there for all the virtues they can present... Enjoy! You know, the whole thing, the "split time-units after Big Bang", the "supersymmetry" on this basis, the "symmetry" and "symmetry break and the rest", it's... *for you to decide* (incl. other mysteries of this kind)! So therefore, at this point I don't go into that, but I admit that speculation is fun and it's going to be exciting to see how the map of science develops! Cheers!
Note: Originally added15 December 2011 23:22 on Whatiswritten as comment under "Opinions on Physics"!
I just add the list, *The Kill List* for the Higgs':
Why the Higgs' field of the Universe when the Universe is (mostly?) "best" vacuum?!
How does Higgs' fit into the Unifying work of Physics?
Is it really necessary to have the Higgs-Boson to explain mass?
Why can't ordinary particles have mass simply by property, that is, mass is part of their nature?
Even then, why is it necessary for mass to "obtain" rather than to be as in "gravity", one form or another, i.e., explanation?
"Technicolour" isn't an alternative as it confuses "energy" and "forces"?
Wasn't the intention in the first place (by 3,5 TeV/7 TeV) to smash these pieces smaller? So that the Protons would be split to smaller bits? Then CERN presents masses on 125 GeV? What?
The Up Quark has mass 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c(2) and 125 GeV(/c(2)) means something bigger than the Protons even, so you're considering "fusion effects" of the Protons to be the Higgs-Boson?
Finally, the realism: To summarise the masses: Higgs Boson is suggested to 125 GeV(/c(2)), Proton 938.272046(21) MeV(/c2), W boson, 80.398±0.023 GeV/c2, Z boson, 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2 and (finally) the Up quark 1.7 - 3.1 MeV/c2! Good? Merry Christmas!
Reaction, as in the military: Add the Photon Theory by asserting (plausibly) that "Photons are the smallest constituents of all matter. I assume the other particles of the Standard Model are made up of photons. Why is this? The sun burns mass and to my knowledge it only/mostly by far emits electromagnetic radiation, consequently in the form of photons. When a nuclear bomb explodes, it converts matter into electromagnetic radiation, energy of various forms. Compared to this, I think one can throw the string theory out the window along with dimensions beyond the usual 4 (I'm not certain about this concerning Einstein's theories that I'd like to keep as it is). Also, let's assume higher intensity radiation emits more dense amounts of photons and that it declines further down the electromagnetic spectrum.
(Extra: New on photons: I think I can also hold that photons are "semi-fluid" on a hyper-level (of course). I don't know what this adds to our view of reality, but it's a possible way of reconciling the wave-particle duality.)" On top of the Photon Theory: Unifying work -> full speed ahead!
You may want to check out Slashdot org under "LHC Homes In On Possible Higgs Boson Around 126GeV", message nr. 207, and The Kill List and the Photon Theory that's added there for all the virtues they can present... Enjoy! You know, the whole thing, the "split time-units after Big Bang", the "supersymmetry" on this basis, the "symmetry" and "symmetry break and the rest", it's... *for you to decide* (incl. other mysteries of this kind)! So therefore, at this point I don't go into that, but I admit that speculation is fun and it's going to be exciting to see how the map of science develops! Cheers!
Note: Originally added15 December 2011 23:22 on Whatiswritten as comment under "Opinions on Physics"!
Monday, 27 February 2012
My Achievements in Physics (Ver. 2 :-D )
Bragging list in Physics:
- New gravity theory
-> comparison of electron shells to the atom core
-> to gravity from the Earth itself starting with the Earth
--> most heavy and then outward toward the upper limits of
--> Earth gas atoms
- Wave collapse to psychology
- Schrödinger's rat
-> First to decisively crush Schrödinger's theory by his
--> rat/cat
- Revisionist Standard Model, 27 particles
- Definite destruction of QCD
- Likely destruction of String Theory
-> Mathematical point over Grigori Perelman
- Demolition of the Copenhagen Interpretation
-> only 1 direct observation and 2/3 indirect observation
--> points to remain
- First HARD realist in Physics for the World to follow
- Two photon experimental designs meant to pave the way forward to
-> quantify the photons and to make possible the studies of photons
--> interacting with materials, here, the metals
- Photon theory has also emerged from my works
- Impossibility of both the Graviton and the Higgs Boson have also been completed
- I've also added two additions to The Free Will Theorem by John H. Conway and
-> Simon B. Kochen
-> that address complexity and size of body to obtain Free Will and
--> that the neutral state has to be included in the Free Will Theorem,
--> thus making the whole thing look less sharp or "more relaxed" so
--> that not every moment is about "good and evil",
--> but rather about "good, neutral and evil", time being more at your
--> discretion
So: ("- all the rest!", uncertain to what exactly this is, given that I need to recapitulate on all my text!) I don't hide the fact that I'm VERY proud of this list that should now be unique and one of the best in the World! Thank you for the attention this far!
- New gravity theory
-> comparison of electron shells to the atom core
-> to gravity from the Earth itself starting with the Earth
--> most heavy and then outward toward the upper limits of
--> Earth gas atoms
- Wave collapse to psychology
- Schrödinger's rat
-> First to decisively crush Schrödinger's theory by his
--> rat/cat
- Revisionist Standard Model, 27 particles
- Definite destruction of QCD
- Likely destruction of String Theory
-> Mathematical point over Grigori Perelman
- Demolition of the Copenhagen Interpretation
-> only 1 direct observation and 2/3 indirect observation
--> points to remain
- First HARD realist in Physics for the World to follow
- Two photon experimental designs meant to pave the way forward to
-> quantify the photons and to make possible the studies of photons
--> interacting with materials, here, the metals
- Photon theory has also emerged from my works
- Impossibility of both the Graviton and the Higgs Boson have also been completed
- I've also added two additions to The Free Will Theorem by John H. Conway and
-> Simon B. Kochen
-> that address complexity and size of body to obtain Free Will and
--> that the neutral state has to be included in the Free Will Theorem,
--> thus making the whole thing look less sharp or "more relaxed" so
--> that not every moment is about "good and evil",
--> but rather about "good, neutral and evil", time being more at your
--> discretion
So: ("- all the rest!", uncertain to what exactly this is, given that I need to recapitulate on all my text!) I don't hide the fact that I'm VERY proud of this list that should now be unique and one of the best in the World! Thank you for the attention this far!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
10 minutes ago
The usual factors, all else, include of course healthy diet, physical exercise and controlled weight, that is, all other factors equal on the usual health considerations for HAVING good health!
8 minutes ago
If I get this "squared" like this, I think people have the right to know, given both a good sentiment and of course *CUTTING* (by scythe) a part of World stupidity, at least potentially!!!
6 minutes ago
(I have earlier written about MRSA and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's under Whatiswritten777, this blog, under Blogspot.com.
5 minutes ago) - Cheers!
Note: First to Facebook just minutes ago.